Answer:
1. He was a POC ( person of color)
2. He was homosexual (gay) during a time that everyone did not accept
<u>Answer:
</u>
These different ways of eating are all part of the same response class.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- As the topography changes, the response exhibited by the individual changes accordingly.
- This change in the response comes as a result of awareness of the surroundings and its relationship with self behavior.
- The awareness of the surrounding often tends an individual to behave in a more cultured manner.
- This class of varied responses to the surroundings is referred to as the response class.
The justices each have their own opinions which is why there will be conflicting opinions and feelings on a case that they oversee. The power of judicial review limits laws the senate and congress can pass.
Answer:
a. Comprei-o.
b. Encontrei-o.
c. Guarde-as, por favor.
d. Não de levá-los.
e. Deram-o ao rapaz.
f. Disseram-a no tribunal.
g. Acompanhe as no parque.
h. Iremos aguá-las.
i. Vá pegá-lo.
j. Preciso varre-lo urgentemente.
k. Guardaram-os?.
L. Consegui vendê-los.
Explanation:
Olá. Antes de explicar a sua pergunta, é necessário que você saiba que esse não é o site brasileiro e sim o site estadunidense. Isso significa que só é permitido postar pergunts em português na aba "world languagens".
Pronomes obliquos são aqueles que tem a capacidade de ocupar o lugar de um objeto direto ou indireto em uma sentença. Em alguns casos, esses pronomes podem também assumir a função de um adjunto adverbial. Esses pronomes são facilmente identificaveis pela apresentação dos sufixos "o", "a", "los" e "las".
Answer:
overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive.
Explanation:
If the court heard the case, it would likely overturn the punitive damage award as grossly excessive.
This is because, since or if it has been established to be an accident and not intentional, and Mellisa has being fined of $5000 for damages, the $50miliom is unreasonable or too much to pay as the punitive damages. Hence, it will be assumed that the previous jury or verdict violates a sense of justice.
