1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lora16 [44]
3 years ago
14

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

!!!
why did slavery spread in the south A. The cotton gin made cleaning cotton less labor-intensive B. The planters were able to grown more cotton with less labor C. growing cotton spread to more states D. none of the above E. all of the above
History
2 answers:
Ugo [173]3 years ago
6 0
The answer is A. The cotton gin made cleaning cotton less labor-intensive

Shkiper50 [21]3 years ago
3 0
No need to flip :( the answer is A!
You might be interested in
What did Mesopotamians eat?
Alex17521 [72]
The Mesopotamian's ate vegetable soups, stews, and <span>flat </span>bread<span> made of barley. They were not able to afford beef because it was to expensive for them to afford.

Good luck~</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is linked to the Chinese idea of the Mandate of Heaven? dynastic cycles civil service exams the use of gunpowder
-Dominant- [34]
Dynastic cycles is linked to the Chinese idea of the Mandate of Heaven.
5 0
3 years ago
I just need 2 thru 5 asap!
Alexandra [31]

Answer:

i hope this helps <3 pls mark as brainliest

Explanation:

2) Slavery was so profitable, it sprouted more millionaires per capita in the Mississippi River valley than anywhere in the nation. With cash crops of tobacco, cotton and sugar cane, America's southern states became the economic engine of the burgeoning nation. And they just didn't want to give that up.

3)Westward expansion, the 19th-century movement of settlers into the American West, began with the Louisiana Purchase and was fueled by the Gold Rush, the Oregon Trail and a belief in "manifest destiny." In the mid-19th century, the quest for control of the West led to the annexation of Texas and the Mexican–American War. ... This expansion led to debates about the fate of slavery in the West, increasing tensions between the North and South that ultimately led to the collapse of American democracy and a brutal civil war.

4) The exchange of Missouri as a slave state in favor of the ban of slavery north of the 36-30 line and a free Maine was just a temporary solution to the problem. Southerners believed federal regulation of slavery was unconstitutional and to impose a restriction on the instituion of slavery was out of their jurisdiction.

5) The enumerated powers that are listed in the Constitution include exclusive federal powers, as well as concurrent powers that are shared with the states, and all of those powers are contrasted with the reserved powers—also called states' rights—that only the states possess. The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of the United States (Article VI, Clause 2), establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the "supreme Law of the Land", and thus take priority over any conflicting state laws.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did Lincoln do to provoke war?
Reptile [31]
Southern leaders of the Civil War period placed the blame for the outbreak of fighting squarely on Lincoln<span>. They accused the President of acting aggressively towards the South and of deliberately provoking war in order to overthrow the Confederacy. For its part, the Confederacy sought a peaceable accommodation of its legitimate claims to independence, and resorted to measures of self-defence only when threatened by Lincoln's coercive policy. Thus, Confederate vice president, Alexander H. Stephens, claimed that the war was "inaugurated by Mr. Lincoln." Stephens readily acknowledged that General </span>Beauregard's troops fired the "first gun." But, he argued, the larger truth is that "in personal or national conflicts, it is not he who strikes the first blow, or fires the first gun that inaugurates or begins the conflict." Rather, the true aggressor is "the first who renders force necessary."

Stephens identified the beginning of the war as Lincoln's order sending a "hostile fleet, styled the 'Relief Squadron'," to reinforce Fort Sumter. "The war was then and there inaugurated and begun by the authorities at Washington. General Beauregard did not open fire upon Fort Sumter until this fleet was, to his knowledge, very near the harbor of Charleston, and until he had inquired of Major Anderson . . . whether he would engage to take no part in the expected blow, then coming down upon him from the approaching fleet . . . When Major Anderson . . .would make no such promise, it became necessary for General Beauregard to strike the first blow, as he did; otherwise the forces under his command might have been exposed to two fires at the same time-- one in front, and the other in the rear." The use of force by the Confederacy , therefore, was in "self-defence," rendered necessary by the actions of the other side.

Jefferson Davis, who, like Stephens, wrote his account after the Civil War, took a similar position. Fort Sumter was rightfully South Carolina's property after secession, and the Confederate government had shown great "forbearance" in trying to reach an equitable settlement with the federal government. But the Lincoln administration destroyed these efforts by sending "a hostile fleet" to Sumter. "The attempt to represent us as the aggressors," Davis argued, "is as unfounded as the complaint made by the wolf against the lamb in the familiar fable. He who makes the assault is not necessarily he that strikes the first blow or fires the first gun."

From Davis's point of view, to permit the strengthening of Sumter, even if done in a peaceable manner, was unacceptable. It meant the continued presence of a hostile threat to Charleston. Further, although the ostensible purpose of the expedition was to resupply, not reinforce the fort, the Confederacy had no guarantee that Lincoln would abide by his word. And even if he restricted his actions to resupply in this case, what was to prevent him from attempting to reinforce the fort in the future? Thus, the attack on Sumter was a measure of "defense." To have acquiesced in the fort's relief, even at the risk of firing the first shot, "would have been as unwise as it would be to hesitate to strike down the arm of the assailant, who levels a deadly weapon at one's breast, until he has actually fired."

In the twentieth century, this critical view of Lincoln's actions gained a wide audience through the writings of Charles W. Ramsdell and others. According to Ramsdell, the situation at Sumter presented Lincoln with a series of dilemmas. If he took action to maintain the fort, he would lose the border South and a large segment of northern opinion which wanted to conciliate the South. If he abandoned the fort, he jeopardized the Union by legitimizing the Confederacy. Lincoln also hazarded losing the support of a substantial portion of his own Republican Party, and risked appearing a weak and ineffective leader.

Lincoln could escape these predicaments, however, if he could induce southerners to attack Sumter, "to assume the aggressive and thus put themselves in the wrong in the eyes of the North and of the world." By sending a relief expedition, ostensibly to provide bread to a hungry garrison, Lincoln turned the tables on the Confederates, forcing them to choose whether to permit the fort to be strengthened, or to act as the aggressor. By this "astute strategy," Lincoln maneuvered the South into firing the first shot.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to Phil Murphy in his most recent laws on the state's rights, he stated that there is a rundown city that should be av
LenKa [72]

Oh that's easy! The answer to your question is "Paramoose"

3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7. Does Truman present American policy as offensive or defensive? What words or phrases does Truman use to present policy in thi
    9·1 answer
  • What economic and social factors in the United States led to differing ideas about slavery in the North and the South?
    14·1 answer
  • The american prison reformer who introduced parole to the elmira reformatory in new york in 1876 was​
    5·1 answer
  • What is limited government?
    14·2 answers
  • Identify the playwright--Aeschylus, Sophocles, Euripides, or Aristophanes--described in the following statement.
    9·2 answers
  • How have American Indian tribes in and around Washington invested in the state and their own communities? Be sure to include spe
    8·1 answer
  • The U.S. paid _________ to __________ for the upper portion of California and parts of New Mexico.
    15·2 answers
  • The british government issued the proclamation of 1763 to limit the area british colonists were allowed to settle. Which geograp
    9·1 answer
  • The British met less opposition in the South because:
    13·1 answer
  • Which holy man created the first community of monks in egypt and laid the foundations for the monastic movement?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!