It would be my pleasure to help you out on this answer. Would it be alright if you would take a photo of the text your are going to right about?
Answer: Pride and prejudice focuses on themes like love, marriage, division of society into classes.
Explanation: Pride and prejudice focuses on the various ways of how love might grow and disappear. It also focuses on whether the society has place for love, romance in it or not.
The major themes on which Pride and Prejudice focuses on are love, marriage, wealth, family, women and feminity in it. The theme of the Pride and prejudice on dividing the society into various classes based on wealth and money is relevant in today's society also.
Answer: The power grabbing of the Axis countries implies that the United States must ramp up its preparations for war.
Explanation:
You included no paragraphs or reference to any passages so I gave the best answer I could based on general historical knowledge.
From the moment Japanese soldiers invaded Manchuria and German soldiers remilitarized the Rhine, the Axis powers of Germany, Japan and Italy began to capture more and more territory until the second World War broke out.
The U.S. all the way on the other side of the Atlantic and the Pacific (Japanese perspective), watched with some alarm especially when the world thought that Britain would fall. As a result, the U.S. began to ramp up preparations for war such that when the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in December 1941, the U.S. were not completely unprepared for war.
In the final chapter of his narrative, Douglass explains that he does not describe his escape with precision, because he does not want to give any advantage to slave owners. Giving them too many details of how did he escape would help slave owners to prevent the escape of their slaves to the North. Douglass hopes to generate in the slave owners a certain feeling of paranoia, and make it as difficult as possible for them to retain their slaves.
Answer:
Credible evidence
Explanation:
Eyewitness accounts – this is not the right answer. There is actually no eyewitness in that specific sense of the word when it comes to literal work.
Personal narrative – this is not correct. The analysis is a scientific method and it should not use personal accounts. Therefore, the personal narrative is not the analysis.
<u> Credible evidence – this is the correct answer.</u> <u>When trying to do the literal analysis one should use as objective facts as possible.</u> This means they should note facts, <u>such as the name of the author, the name of the work, publisher, etc. </u>All these are credible evidence that can be easily confirmed and which are objective.
Alternate ending – this is not the right answer. The point of the analysis is not to change the narrative or speculate, so an alternative ending should not be included.
