Classical and operant conditioning are two basic concepts in behavioral psychology. They both describe the learning process, but from different angles. In order to understand how each of these methods of behavior modification can be used, it is also important to understand how they differ.
Classical conditioning:
- It was first described by Ivan Pavlovym, a Russian physiologist;
- It implies a neutral stimulus to the reflex;
- It is oriented to involuntary, automatic actions.
Operand conditioning:
- It was first described by B. F. Skinner, an American psychologist;
- It includes the use of reinforcements or punishments after demonstrating behavior;
- It is aimed at reinforcement of the controlled behavior.
One of the simplest ways to find the difference between the classical and the operant is to analyze the behavior and to understand whether it is conscious or subconscious. Classical teaching implies the creation of an association between stimulus and involuntary reaction, while the operand takes into account the connection between consciously controlled behavior and its consequences.
Explanation:
In the Tenth Amendment, the Constitution also recognizes the powers of the state governments. The new Tenth Amendment stated: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” ...25 Mar 2013.
A mediation is an interactive process in which two parties try to resolve a conflict. This method requires the help of a mediator, who is an impartial third party who is specialized in the resolution of conflict through methods such as communication and negotiation techniques.
On the other hand, a neutral case evaluation is a process in which a neutral person examines the evidence and gives his opinion on the case. This is a relatively quick and easy procedure that can help both parties manage their expectations.
I would recommend a mediation in this case. It is clear that both parties have great interest in the dog. However, it is also likely that both parties would want to benefit the dog more than themselves. Because of this, I believe that they would be more open to talking and discussing alternatives. Through mediation, it could be possible for both parties to be reasonably satisfied with the outcome.
