Answer:
A. the French
Explanation:
This situation occurred during the French and Indian war. The fought actually occurred between France and Great Britain, but both sides were supported by some Native American tribes.
The cause of the fight was an issue when determining the owners of upper Ohio River valley. The French argued that the part of the river was belonged to them because controlling that part of the river will opened up a path for trades to Virginia and Pennsylvania, Gaining this will resulted in great economic benefits for whoever own that part of the river.
Answer: the economic policy of the government of the soviet union from 1921 to 1928 representing a temporary retreat from its previous policy of extreme centralization and doctrinaire socialism
Explanation:
google
Answer:
Which of the following developments can be most directly attributed to Portuguese and Spanish state sponsorship of maritime exploration in the late fifteenth century? 1.) improvemets in European geographic knowledge of Africa and the indian Ocean.
Explanation:
First of all, we have to analyze each option.
1.- is correct because at the time the Spanish and Portuguese crown were looking for new trade routes, land to colonize and develop learnings from the seas that no one else could have in order to take advantage of them. Those were difficult times for the European powers, they all looked or expansion and gather wealth. So they sponsored explorers to find new paths in the sea.
2.- The Spanish and Portuguese explorations sponsored by their respective crowns were focused to develop expansionism and trade. Instead of finding new ways to treat diseases. So it's wrong.
3.- Both the Portuguese and Spanish crowns were supported by the catholic church and it was their official religion. So, they couldn't provide separatist movements. In fact, they lead fights against countries just because they had different perspectives from Catholisism. So it's wrong.
4.- Portugal and Spain tried o get colonies by exploring the seas, so it's wrong.
