The answer is d. they are seeking to either support or reject the hypothesis upon which the study was founded
Answer:
Peer testimony
Explanation:
A testimony is simply called a given statement by a person who possesses a reasonable or logical connection to the subject, field or topic and He or she must be a credible source. Mostly, it can be used to either clarify or prove a point.
Peer testimony can simply be defined as when a statement or testimony is being given by an individual who does not have expertise in the that particular area, field or subject that is in question. they can also be called antiauthorities because it's testimony source that is neither expert nor celebrity, but likely to the subject of an audience. Paul may not be an expert in that field but he has personal experience with the issue in question.
It should be noted that Martin Luther King was called an extremist D. because an extremist is someone whose views are too far outside the mainstream.
<h3>Who's Martin Luther King?</h3>
Martin Luther King was an African American who advocated for equality and freedom. He was a civil rights legend.
Luther King was called an extremist because an extremist is someone whose views are too far outside the mainstream. He wanted freedom and equality for blacks.
Learn more about Martin Luther King on:
brainly.com/question/17746240
Answer:
They were the monks and the kings loyal people they have more rights gold and freedom can control other people and own slaves in ancient Egypt.
Answer:Weak,Inductive,Uncogent
Explanation:This tries to compare Sierra Nevada mountain range and the island of Jamaica are both popular tourist destinations.
The conclusion made by this statement is WEAK, INDUCTIVE AND UNCOGENT.
The information about the bringing of Ski equipment when traveling to Jamaica in February is not a strong, deductive and cogent conclusion as both areas are not exactly the same as stated by the write up.
A conclusion is said to be weak when it does not have strong evidence to back it up,it is said to be inductive if it is not fully supported by the premise and it is said to be Uncogent when the argument is not clear and believable.
