Answer:
We can see that every child has a different calibre to understand and learn things. Some children do not tend to have a strong mind in certain field and have to work hard in those subjects. Others might be hardworking and good at a subject. Among children, a teacher might know students who have a good understanding of a subject but are careless towards their responsibilities. Such children are intelligent but lazy.
In the scenario mentioned in the question, the teacher should ask the child to complete the task at home or during free time.
It is true because friends, counselors, and parents can give you guidance and advise. Thus will help you when you are in trouble. This, releasing the stress.
1. limits the government to the powers which the Constitution delegated to it (strict construction)
2. gathering for the purpose of creating a Constitution which laid down the laws for running the U.S. (Constitutional Convention)
3. Republican President during the Civil War (Abraham Lincoln)
4. began as a series of anti-slavery political meetings held in the Midwest in 1854 (Republican Party)
5. free interpretation of the Constitution, allowing the government all powers not denied it (loose construction)
6. started the Democratic Party
(Andrew Jackson)
The statement the articles of confederation gave a president the power to execute laws and veto legislation is false.
<h3><u>
Explanation:
</u></h3>
The very reason behind opting to replace the "Articles of Confederation" was that they created an imbalance of power by vesting more power in the hands of the state governments. There are no provisions provided by Articles of Confederation for an executive branch.
The President and the Federal government functioned with very little authority and were greatly under powered. The President almost functioned like a nominal head.The legislature holds the executive power under the "Articles of Confederation".
He discussed for democracy, but not for freedom, appealing
that anyone who differs with the general will should be involuntary to monitor
it. He appears to be supporting something like an "absolute
democracy" with complete civil equality, a factual democracy before a
republic, and he openly says that political parties would weaken or disintegrate
a political system founded on the general will.
A dictatorship crashes with this wholly for the reason that whoever governs
the country is not governmentally equal with the rest of the individuals and
can create an oppression of an individual or party. He is disagreeing for a tyranny of the
majority.
