Answer:
Odesenvolvimento tecnologico do século XIX, permitiu a produção de produtos em larga escala, o que melhorou a economia, a disponibilidade de produtos e as relações sociais.
Explanation:
Primeiramente, é importante falar que você só pode postar perguntas em português nesse site no campo "World Languagens" porque esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano. Caso contrario, a sua pergunta pode ser excluída.
Em relação ao desenvolvimento tecnologico no século XIX, podemos considerar que estamos falando da revolução industrial, que foi a responsavel pelo surgimento das fábricas, da produção em larga escala, do trabalho em série e do trabalho assalariado. Essa revolução, estimulou a criação de tecnologias que beneficaram a sociedade de forma grandiosa, além de melhorar a economia das regiões por conta do contrato de trabalhadores e rápida oferta de produtos em grandes quantidades.
Answer:
uumm i d k i mean theres alot of blacks and hispanics i mean beraly any whites
Explanation:
but um i dont know yes i guesss
Calhoun advanced the position that a state could declare a national law void. The members of the South Carolina legislature defended the rights of the states against the federal government. The South Carolina Ordinance of Nullification (SCON) was enacted into law on November 24, 1832 (185 year, 1 month, 25 days, 19 hours, 6 minutes, 13 seconds ago)
Preserving the land was very important
The answer is <u>D. Elections are often decided by only a few voters.</u>
This is the best answer because this argument set the basis to explain the importance of every person's vote in a democratic government. Although one's vote might seem like it doesn't make a difference, it actually does, the election results are made of all the persons who relied on the voting system to express their political preference and make a difference. This is true especially in elections when candidates are strong because the elections tend to be decided by only a small difference (a few voters),
Besides, option A is incorrect because voting doesn't aim to symbolize an act, but to choose a leader who will express him/her ideology through the creation of policies that will determine a country's present and future.
Voting isn't less important than other types of civic engagement, it's equally important, if not more.
And voting is not mandatory by law, is a right guaranteed in the constitution that we all have as citizens, but it's not necessarily mandatory.
