1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikklg [1K]
3 years ago
11

Like so many presidents before him, Woodrow Wilson did little if anything about which of these issues?

History
1 answer:
Inga [223]3 years ago
6 0
C. racism and women's suffrage
You might be interested in
In a civil case the party that files sult against another person is called the
Svetlanka [38]

They are called the plaintiff

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the earliest challenge that Pánfilo de Narváez and his crew faced on their journey?
telo118 [61]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

I have done this before

6 0
3 years ago
As political differences began to fade away, what phrase did a Boston newspaper use to describe the years after the War of 1812?
kodGreya [7K]
After the War of 1812, America' sense of social and political unity was at an all time high, especially after fending off the British for the second time in less than 50 years. To describe this period of American unity, a Boston newspaper described this time of the "Era of Good Feelings." This title represented both the unity in America's moral after defeating the British, but it also refers to the lack of arguing/fighting in politics. This era brought the collapse of the Federalist party, with only the Democratic-Republican party remaining. This party began to unit and settle several differences that divided them prior to the war. This era lasted less than a decade and would precede some of the most divisive eras in American history.
8 0
3 years ago
What was president carters response to the soviet unions invasion of Afghanistan in 1979
Aliun [14]
I come to you this evening to discuss the extremely important and rapidly changing circumstances in Southwest Asia. . . .

. . . Massive Soviet military forces have invaded the small, nonaligned, sovereign nation of Afghanistan, which had hitherto not been an occupied satellite of the Soviet Union.

Fifty thousand heavily armed Soviet troops have crossed the border and are now dispersed throughout Afghanistan, attempting to conquer the fiercely independent Muslim people of that country.

The Soviets claim, falsely, that they were invited into Afghanistan to help protect that country from some unnamed outside threat. But the President, who had been the leader of Afghanistan before the Soviet invasion, was assassinated – along with several members of his family – after the Soviets gained control of the capital city of Kabul. Only several days later was the new puppet leader even brought into Afghanistan by the Soviets.

This invasion is an extremely serious threat to peace because of the threat of further Soviet expansion into neighboring countries in Southwest Asia and also because such an aggressive military policy is unsettling to other peoples throughout the world.

This is a callous violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. It is a deliberate effort of a powerful atheistic government to subjugate an independent Islamic people.

We must recognize the strategic importance of Afghanistan to stability and peace. A Soviet-occupied Afghanistan threatens both Iran and Pakistan and is a steppingstone to possible control over much of the world’s oil supplies.

The United States wants all nations in the region to be free and to be independent. If the Soviets are encouraged in this invasion by eventual success, and if they maintain their dominance over Afghanistan and then extend their control to adjacent countries, the stable, strategic, and peaceful balance of the entire world will be changed. This would threaten the security of all nations including, of course, the United States, our allies, and our friends.

Therefore, the world simply cannot stand by and permit the Soviet Union to commit this act with impunity. Fifty nations have petitioned the United Nations Security Council to condemn the Soviet Union and to demand the immediate withdrawal of all Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

. . . [N]either the United States nor any other nation which is committed to world peace and stability can continue to do business as usual with the Soviet Union.

I have already recalled the United States Ambassador from Moscow back to Washington. He’s working with me and with my other senior advisers in an immediate and comprehensive evaluation of the whole range of our relations with the Soviet Union.

The successful negotiation of the SALT II treaty1 has been a major goal and a major achievement of this administration, and we Americans, the people of the Soviet Union, and indeed the entire world will benefit from the successful control of strategic nuclear weapons through the implementation of this carefully negotiated treaty.

However, because of the Soviet aggression, I have asked the United States Senate to defer further consideration of the SALT II treaty so that the Congress and I can assess Soviet actions and intentions and devote our primary attention to the legislative and other measures required to respond to this crisis. As circumstances change in the future, we will, of course, keep the ratification of SALT II under active review in consultation with the leaders of the Senate.

The Soviets must understand our deep concern. We will delay opening of any new American or Soviet consular facilities, and most of the cultural and economic exchanges currently under consideration will be deferred. Trade with the Soviet Union will be severely restricted. . . .

Along with other countries, we will provide military equipment, food, and other assistance to help Pakistan defend its independence and its national security against the seriously increased threat it now faces from the north. The United States also stands ready to help other nations in the region in similar ways.

Neither our allies nor our potential adversaries should have the slightest doubt about our willingness, our determination, and our capacity to take the measures I have outlined tonight. I have consulted with leaders of the Congress, and I am confident they will support legislation that may be required to carry out these measures.

History teaches, perhaps, very few clear lessons. But surely one such lesson learned by the world at great cost is that aggression, unopposed, becomes a contagious disease. . . .
8 0
2 years ago
What year did our Constitution begin to march through time?
ArbitrLikvidat [17]

Answer:

1789

stuff began happening at that time

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • By studying______a historian may develop for those affected ​
    13·2 answers
  • Henry W. Grady sought to recruit investors from the North to rebuild the South. What phrase did he coin about his home?
    14·1 answer
  • How was the picture of Washington removed from its frame?
    11·1 answer
  • What was reaganomics, and what policies were championed by reagan and passed by congress in support of it? what other actions di
    8·1 answer
  • 5. What was a result of the Long March?
    13·1 answer
  • 5 people you would put in the scientific hall of fame and what they have done
    11·1 answer
  • How did the steamboat impact society?
    14·1 answer
  • What became illegal under the Sedition Act?​
    14·1 answer
  • Cause and Effect: Describe the effects of industrialization and urbanization on the health of people living in Manchester and ot
    6·1 answer
  • You don't know what to do with yo life, do you?.<br> Give me a song to listen to please.
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!