Why Athletes are Good Role Models
1475 Words6 Pages
Why Athletes are Good Role Models
Ever since the ancient years, we have admired athletes and the hard work that they do to achieve their goal of winning. We idolize them and wish we were more like them. What happens though when the realization sinks in that they are human too and that some of them do get greedy and selfish? A lot of athletes are model citizens that you should really look up to, but there are also some bad apples in the bunch that ruin it for everyone. Athletes can inspire young people to work hard so that their efforts can pay off, but no one is pure and flawless. Greed does take a hold of some players, but they shouldn't be the ones we devote all of our attention to. We should look at the
positive…show more content…
Shaquille O'Neal bought over 1,000 turkeys and gave to needy families all across the nation on Thanksgiving. I did not hear one mention of that in the news. They are making us believe that all athletes are bad people with their propaganda. If they spent half the time covering the good-hearted stories that they do the bad ones, we would have a different opinion on the hard working athlete.
Michael Jordan has started a foundation that donates money for research to help physically challenged children. He has been running up the tabs at
Atlantic City casinos, but who hasn't gambled? We are not perfect. Michael may gamble, but he does his share of helping and works hard for what he has acquired.
Gambling is no crime, so then he is not showing us a negative thing. If parents disapprove of him gambling, then they should outlaw it because he is not doing anything wrong. Michael, and other athletes as well, is aware that he is constantly being watched by millions and tries to act accordingly.
There has been a major controversy in the NBA lately thanks to Charles
Barkley and his claim in an interview that he is not a role model, but that is the job of the parent. He says that parents shouldn't be blaming the athletes if they can't control their own children. Another person that agrees with this notion is football and was paid 80,000$ a year
Answer:
What the Roman general Publius Cornelius Scipio did was to to take the war to North Africa by threating Carthage itself around 203 BCE, having even won a battle some 32 kilometers from the city that was Rome archrival. Hannibal and his brother Mago were recalled from their campigns in Italy to organize the defense of the city. Scipio and Hanibal fought a last great battle in Zama in 202 BCE, in which the Romans and their allies crushed the Carthaginian army under Hannibal´s command. Hard terms - huge indemnities, burning of a great number of ships and others - were impose on Carthage. It was the end of the Second Punic War and of Carthage´s challenge to Rome.
Explanation:
Answer:
Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population.
Explanation:
<span>B. An international athletic competition in which nations compete peacefully C. An economic competition between factory owners and private citizens D. An international competition in which nations fight one another in war games</span>