The three factors that could contribute to a source not being
credible is it ineptness, unreliable and unattractive which are the opposed
characteristics to what makes a source credibly valid and reliable or
trustworthy. The supposed characteristics can make the source invalid as simple
as having to read, comprehend and understand what it’s trying to say. In research
or formal study many authors are very direct to the point and persuasively
convincing in support to their results and outcomes. In addition, there are
other co-authors that can support such claims and suggestions.
"Predicate nominative" is the one among the following choices that are given in the question that shows the <span>kind of complement the word SHORELINE is. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or option "D". I hope the answer has helped you.</span>
The excerpt which mentions the significance of Ptolemy Copernicus is the one which supports that informational texts use images to support ideas from Robert Stawell Ball's Great Astronomers.
<h3>What is the significance of Robert Stawell?</h3>
Robert Stawell Ball was an astronaut who hailed from Ireland. He wrote a book Great Astronomers, which mentions some astronomers like Ptolemy Copernicus, Isaac Newton and Galileo.
Hence, excerpt #2 holds true in support of the Robert Stawell Ball. The complete question has been attached with an image for better reference.
Learn more about Robert Stawell Ball here:
brainly.com/question/2519986
#SPJ1
An archetype is a regular character, an activity or a circumstance that appears to speak to such all inclusive examples of human instinct.
