Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
Answer:
enfranchised
Explanation:
The definition of disenfranchised is having had your rights or privileges taken away, or being deprived of the chance to vote. Felons who are no longer allowed to vote in elections are an example of people who would be described as disenfranchised. adjective. enfranchise gives people rights to vote.
Answer:
D seems to be the better answer.
Explanation:
Become a better person and for school get better grades and pay attention in class.
Answer:
Arrowheads and spearheads are some of the most familiar objects made by Native Americans.
Explanation:
This one is the example of objective writing, the sentence sattes "Most familar", words like that emphasize it's someone opioion and not an actual fact. Therefore it is the objective sentence.
