1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andreas93 [3]
3 years ago
8

How was William Wilberforce, a member of Parliament, able to affect the future of slavery in Britain?

History
2 answers:
Advocard [28]3 years ago
8 0
William Wilberforce, a member of Parliament was able to affect the future of slavery in Britain, because he helped pass the Slave Trade Act of 1807 and later on the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 which abolished slavery in all British colonies. This included slave trade and all other things related to slavery being abolished in the Indian subcontinent, African colonies and colonies in the Caribbean.
chubhunter [2.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

b In 1807, he achieved a ban on British slave trade.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which nation violated the Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1931?
padilas [110]

a is your answer for #1, #2 c, #3 b. I took the quick check already. 100%
8 0
4 years ago
District courts are the only federal courts that _____
galina1969 [7]

District courts are the only federal courts that use a jury.

5 0
3 years ago
Guys I really need help with this PLEASE Get 50 point for answer all
Veseljchak [2.6K]

wait whats the question, ill answer in the comments after

4 0
3 years ago
Can someone write a paragraph about Dionysus?
lara [203]
Dionysus was a greek god of fertility, and wine later considered a Patron of the arts. He created wine and spread the art of viticulture. He had a dual nature: on one hand, he brought joy and ecstasy, or he would bring brutal, and blinding rage, thus reflecting the dual nature of wine. Dionysus could not be found by fetters. Dionysus was the son Zeus and Semele, and was the only god with a mortal parent. 
3 0
3 years ago
HELP!!!! <br> How did the smuggling of good and the non-important agreement hurt the British economy
makkiz [27]

Answer:

Smuggling prevented the British economy from taxing on imports. Non-imported (i think you mean) agreements were protests by colonists from purchasing British goods, preventing revenue to enter the British economy.

Explanation:

Non-IMPORTED agreements were a series of commercial restrictions adopted by American colonists to protest British revenue policies prior to the American Revolution.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did most enslaved people cope with the miserable conditions they faced?
    14·2 answers
  • Match each term with its definition.
    12·2 answers
  • What decision by gerald ford cost him popular support?
    6·2 answers
  • The introduction of the cotton gin meant that enslaved workers on Southern plantations no longer had to
    14·1 answer
  • What three words summed up the New France? What three freedoms did “The Rights of Man” include?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the outcome of the Seven Weeks’ War
    9·2 answers
  • Which country claimed Vietnam as a colony after World War II?
    8·2 answers
  • What makes wind energy “green”
    11·2 answers
  • What is your dream career path from your first job to retiremen
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following below would best represent the "Factors of Production?" 7.01 B
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!