The answer is most likely "The order of its main points"
The sentence that compares the Persian Gulf War to the second World War is option A: We succeeded in the struggle for freedom in Europe because we and our allies remained stalwart.
<h3>What was a direct outcome of the Persian Gulf War?</h3>
The direct aftermath of the war, was that Hussein's army or forces were said to ultimately suppressed the uprisings that was said to have been done by the Kurds in the area of north of Iraq and also that of the Shi'ites in the south.
The United States was said to have led a coalition that was also said to have failed to aid the uprisings, and they were afraid that the Iraqi state would be broken down if they had succeeded.
Hence, The sentence that compares the Persian Gulf War to the second World War is option A: We succeeded in the struggle for freedom in Europe because we and our allies remained stalwart.
Learn more about Persian Gulf War from
brainly.com/question/27024452
#SPJ1
See full question below
Which sentence in the passage compares the Persian Gulf War to World War II?
We succeeded in the struggle for freedom in Europe because we and our allies remained stalwart. Keeping the peace in the Middle East will require no less. We're beginning a new era. This new era can be full of promise, an age of freedom, a time of peace for all peoples. But if history teaches us anything, it is that we must resist aggression or it will destroy our freedoms. Appeasement does not work.
Answer:
Any list of particular characteristics of the literature of romanticism includes subjectivity and an emphasis on individualism; spontaneity; freedom from rules; solitary life rather than life in society; the beliefs that imagination is superior to reason and devotion to beauty; love of and worship of nature;
Explanation:
Use context clues to find the meaning of the word 'satiated'
context clues will help you to find the meaning of the word 'cloister'
i used context clues to find the defination of 'aerie'
The point of view goes from a third person and is limited to the third person omniscient.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the chapter, Franz Kafka The meta morphis, towards the end, there is a shift that takes place. The shift is that the view of point goes from a third person limited to the third person omniscient.
Omniscient is the person who knows every thing. So the point of view remains limited to that person only because he knows every thing already.
