* entertainment for themselves (theater). This was all due to the earlier innovations like building this with mathema
* Many buildings were made as well as many other architectural things (banks, churches, etc); Mathematics was also a huge part of the golden age as they started to develop these skills with their leader and with their theatre building/plays. They used mathematics for their projects and to explore nature.
* Now that they had these innovations people grew in their religion because they now had churches, were growing in their knowledge and also creating more enteritis, exploring nature, and examining art. Each of these were a key factor because art game them design, mathematics gave them the ability to build, and nature gave them a place to map out or place their structure.
There are the articles, the amendments and the preamble.
Wilson envisioned for the League of Nations to help settle disputes between nations.
Option B
<h3>
<u>Explanation:</u></h3>
Goals Wilson envisioned for the league of Nations was settling the disputes between nation. After the Paris Peace Conference, in 1919 the League of Nations was founded. The League's goals are as follows,
- <em>Preventing war through collective security.</em>
- <em>Settling disputes between countries through negotiation diplomacy and improving global welfare.</em>
Since armed force are lacking in Leaking, so it depends on the Great powers to enact the resolutions and maintain economic sanctions or provide Army for league to use.
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
