Um, I'm going to try to view this from like, a non-biased side. There's not going to be any personal attacks here or political party attacks. This is based on whether he a good /politician/ and nothing else. That being said, his policies aren't good. There's nothing really debatable here, literally everyone in Congress agrees. The only reason anything got passed this year is because in 2018 mid-term re-elections come up, and the Republicans will lose their chokehoId on Congress. Like, okay, the Republicans have had /complete/ control of Congress (the House AND the Senate have Republican majority) and nothing's gotten passed. Trump, as a Republican, should have had the easiest time EVER getting whatever he wanted passed because pretty much all of Congress is on his political side, but he's barely passed anything. This is literal fact, and it's almost pitiful. So, let me give you my analysis of him, to start off. Again, no personal vendettas here. He knows how to build ideas, he knows how to create a dedicated group of supporters that will believe in him no matter what he does. But he doesn't know how to be a good politician. One of his major flaws is that he doesn't compromise, doesn't work with people. He doesn't understand public image, as you can clearly see by his disdain of the press. "But mainstream media is eviI!" Okay, but that's your personal viewpoint. He's the /president/. His job isn't to attack news networks, it's to cooperate with world leaders, and appear rational, reasonable, calm, considerate, and good-natured and likeable to the rest of the world whether he likes it or not, and whether you like it or not. That's what being president is. And he's failed at that. He also doesn't compromise on his policies. He's not willing to negotiate, it's his way or nothing. I'm willing to say every one of his policies would have passed if he was willing to make changes to his plans, and to compromise. And literally no policy, no standing agreement, nothing we look back at and say as a whole "this majorly impacted the world for good and helped us as a nation, as a world" happened without compromise. Now, this is a terrible aspect for Congress, because while you might not think they're the best people in the world, they have a basic understanding of politics, at the very least. They know what changes are excessive, and what changes are needed that won't collectively pis/s the entire population off. We can give them that, at the very least. And they are, despite what we may think, willing to pass things. They need to show something, to say "hey, I helped pass this, now vote for me again". And they were unwilling for the majority of 2017, because whatever changes they proposed were shot down. And if Congress didn't even like passing his tax cuts now, they certainly won't after re-election, because Congress is going to become Democratic again, and they certainly won't be inclined to pass whatever he offers. (Congress usually switches to the opposite party of the president come re-elections. Not pushing an agenda.) Trump had his chance to pass whatever he wanted, he blew it, and he's never getting that chance again. TL;DR no.
A contingent remainder refers to a legal transfer of property that could only occurs after one specific circumstances mentioned by the original owner rather than the death of original owner itself.
From the case above, the children only receive the property only if the wife of the original owner has passed away (this is the specific circumstances)
<h3>Incompetent successors, administration and policy failure, rise of regional empires, establishment of British East India Company.</h3>
Explanation:
The Mughal Empire declined due to a number of reasons:
Incompetent successors: After the death of Aurangzeb, the empire failed to yield competent rulers to save the already failing empire. The new rulers couldn't manage the vast empire which subsequently led to its failure.
Administration and policy failure: Over time, the rulers couldn't control the rising feudal lords, also known as jagirdars, who gained power and wealth from the failing administrative system of the empire.
Rise of regional empires: Another major problem which the Mughals faced was the rise of powerful regional empires such as the <u>Marathas </u>from the South.
Establishment of British East India Company: The East India Company gave the final blow to the Mughal empire with its strong military force and strategic policies.
Within the joint environment, cooperation requires team players, and the willingness to share credit with all team members.
Option A
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
After a team completes its given task successfully, the organization is required to give credit to all the team members. This not only helps them grow as a team but also as an individual. Sharing credits among the whole team helps in team bonding.
When selective people are pointed out from a team for their efforts and results, the rest of the members tend to feel that their work did not matter in the completion of the task. It further builds up tension among the team members, leading to problems in the future in providing desired outcome. Over all, the organization will fail to achieve its goal when its members do not feel as valued for their efforts as others.
Deindividuation is a term used in social psychology that is generally thought of the loss of a person's self awareness when in a group of people. This is what happen to June when she was <span>not behaving like her normal self and was swept by the behavior of the group.</span>
