Answer: b) this is a private law issue regarding contract law
Explanation: Private law is the law and regulation that is present individuals and has no relation with the government. Contract law states about the law that contains the agreement rules and regulations for binding individual through it.
The situation mentioned in the question about Kate and Micheal states about the problem of private law that is related with contract law. In their situation the private law was made for selling the house of Kate to Micheal.But Kate is refusing to perform transaction process which is raising the issue in the contract law. As per the contract agreement Kate should sell the house to Micheal and by denying to do so , she is creating the issue.
Other options are incorrect because it does not consider government rules so it cannot be a public law.It cannot be substantive law as civil society's regulation and rules are not required in given situation
Criminal law is not related with the situation as crime activity is not involved and tort law is not defined as civil laws are not broken .Thus, the correct option is option(b).
<u>Answer:</u>
When the subordinates have the characteristic of non-cooperation and lack interpersonal understanding, the democratic leadership style turns ineffective.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Running a democracy is only possible through <em>utter cooperation</em> not only among the like-minded people, but also among the people bearing conflicts of thoughts with each other.
- If there is no cooperation among the players running the democracy, the democracy ends up being a mess rather than being a convenient mean of governance.
- As every single player in the democracy is significant for the functioning of the democracy, it is necessary that there is harmony among all the players responsible for the running of democracy.
Answer:
he Federal Executive Council is made up of all government ministers and the Governor-General. the provincial executive administers the province. ... according to my opinion these are the same governmental bodies.
Explanation:
<span><span><span><span><span>The Greeks had a lot of different kinds of governments, because there were many different city-states in ancient Greece, and they each had their own government. In addition, people's ideas about what made a good government changed over time.
Aristotle divided Greek governments into monarchies, oligarchies, tyrannies and democracies, and most historians still use these same divisions. For the most part, Greece began by having monarchies, then oligarchies, then tyrannies and then democracies, but at each period there were plenty of city-states using a different system, and there were many which never did become democracies or tyrannies at all.
In the Late Bronze Age (the Mycenean period), between about 2000 and 1200 BC, all Greek city-states seem to have been monarchies, ruled by kings. Homer's Iliad, and Greek mythology in general, shows us a whole series of kings like Agamemnon and Theseus, and some of their palaces have survived for archaeologists to dig up.
After the Dark Age, though, only a few Greek city-states still had kings. Sparta is the most famous of these, though actually Sparta had two kings, usually brothers or cousins, at the same time. One would stay home and the other go off to fight wars.
Most city-states in the Archaic period were ruled by oligarchies, which is a group of aristocrats (rich men) who tell everyone else what to do. Then in the 600's and 500's BC a lot of city-states were taken over by tyrants. Tyrants were usually one of the aristocrats who got power over the others by getting the support of the poor people. They ruled kind of like kings, but without any legal right to rule.
In 510 BC, the city-state of Athens created the first democratic government, and soon other Greek city-states imitated them. Even city-states that weren't Greek, like Carthage and Rome, experimented with giving the poor people more power at this time. But Athenian democracy did not really give power to everyone. Most of the people in Athens couldn't vote - no women, no slaves, no foreigners (even Greeks from other city-states), no children. And also, Athens at this time had an empire, ruling over many other Greek city-states, and none of those people living in the other city-states could vote either. Of course it is a lot easier to have a democratic government when you are only deciding what other people should do.
(And many Greek city-states kept oligarchic government, or tyrannies, or monarchies, through this whole time).
Then in the 300's BC, Greece was conquered by Philip of Macedon, and all of Greece began to be ruled by him as their king (in theory he was only leading a league of Greek city-states, but really he acted like a king). Athens and other Greek city-states still kept their local democracies or oligarchies for local government, but bigger decisions were made by Philip, and then by Philip's son Alexander the Great.
After Alexander died in 323 BC, Greece became a kingdom ruled by a series of Macedonian kings, until it was gradually taken over by the Romans between 200 and 146 BC. From 146 BC on, Greece was a province of the Roman Empire. Even after the Roman Empire in the West collapsed, Greece was still part of the Eastern Empire. In the 1100's and 1200's AD, parts of Greece were taken over by Normans, who built castles and ruled as kings.
And finally, in 1453 AD, the Turks took over and established Greece as a province in their Ottoman Empire; there was not very much change in the system of government from the Roman Empire.</span></span></span></span></span>
