1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Goshia [24]
3 years ago
15

Until 1971, states could maintain that women were not legally "persons" based on which supreme court decision? in re lockwood in

re adler muller v. oregon brown v. state of virginia
History
1 answer:
Blizzard [7]3 years ago
6 0
That would be the case of "In re Lockwood 154 U.S." in which the court allowed states to determine the scope and the meaning of "person" which in this case the state of Virginia decided that the term "person" only applied to the males. Thus effectively until "Reed v. Reed" trial in 1971 the women were not legally "persons".
You might be interested in
How many men could sit in the “GP?”
Elena-2011 [213]

give more details, and ill answer it...


5 0
3 years ago
Which three groups were helped by the Social Security Act? (4 points)
denpristay [2]
<span>The question says, which three groups were helped by the Social Security Act? They correct option is C. Social security Act was enacted to take care of their elderly, then unemployed people and their disabled in their society who are unable to take care of their daily financial needs.The Act makes financial provisions for their basic needs.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
2. Form of totalitarian government that features extreme nationalism and demands complete loyalty of its citizens: _____________
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

fascism i'm pretty sure.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement correctly describes the trail of tears
Illusion [34]
The answer for this question is B.  seeing as it had nothing to do with black slaves to Liberia and the ocean passage was completely different  and the Irish weren't involved at all

Hope this helps :)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do they mean by "for" and "against "​
skad [1K]

Answer:

For it and against it

Explanation:

dont really know how to explain it but basically for paragraph one you are writing why you should be for it (in favor of; pro) and for paragraph 2 you are writing why you should be against it (opposed to; con)

hope that helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How are electors for the Electoral College determined in each state?
    12·1 answer
  • the _______ church was the eastern half of the christian church and the __________ church was the western half of the christian
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements best describes the spread of Islam during the Arab conquests?
    15·2 answers
  • Describe the offspring of the World War II generation
    10·1 answer
  • What are the main sources of conflict between Israelis and Arabs?
    8·2 answers
  • How was Great Britain able to avoid revolution during the 1800s?
    7·2 answers
  • Why did the ancient Romans gather in the Forum?
    12·1 answer
  • SOLVE ASAP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
    9·2 answers
  • How does supply behave in the short run and long run?
    9·1 answer
  • Does anyone know MrCreepyMan?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!