1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
15

Which argument did the Senators who opposed joining the League of Nations make? European powers would combine to dominate the Le

ague’s agenda. Other members of the League were enemies of the United States. The League would not have its own independent source of income. Membership in the League could draw the United States into future wars.
History
2 answers:
Leya [2.2K]3 years ago
7 0

The answer is option 4: <u>Membership in the League could draw the United States into future wars.</u>

Being part of the League of Nations meant being part of an intergovernmental organization aiming to prevent future wars by uniting nations that would not fight each other. It intended to achieve this through collective security as well as disarmament and by settling international disputes through negotiation and arbitration, among others.

However, it also meant that if any outside country ever attacked any member of the League of Nations, the other member nations would defend, protect and fight on behalf of the attacked country. The American senators were aware of this, and after the devastation of the World War I (1914-18), most Americans were sure they didn't want to involve in any foreign affairs that weren't aligned with their domestic interests and decided to return to their Isolationist policy instead.

alexgriva [62]3 years ago
5 0
"<span>Membership in the League could draw the United States into future wars" would be the best option from the list, since the United States was heavily isolationist at this point, especially after fighting in World War I. </span>
You might be interested in
What concerns did the United States have about Iraq?
WITCHER [35]

Answer:

The right choce is:

It feared Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.

Explanation:

The George W. Bush administration´s main reason for justifying the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was the assumption that the Saddam Hussein´s dictatorship still possessed weapons of mass destruction (chemical weapons), having failed its international obligations to destroy them after the First Gulf War. 9/11 was a very recent event and it was feared those materials could get in the hands of terrorists, according to the line of the US government. After the brief war against the Iraqi army, the US army failed to find those weapons  in the regime´s stockpiles.

8 0
3 years ago
The Bible is filled with knowledge, wisdom, and truth, often applied in familiar sayings.
Ad libitum [116K]

Answer:

True, this answer is true. It is filled with knowledge, wisdom, and truth, which are often applied in familiar sayings.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The growth of European cities around the year 1000 was caused by
Anna007 [38]

Answer:

the increase of population and trade

Explanation:

:)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This first Athenian reform leader established the Citizen's Assembly, forbade enslavement for debts, and made fathers responsibl
tia_tia [17]
<span>It was Solon.  Apart from these reforms, Solon also gave poor citizens the right to vote and also created a court of appeals. This was composed citizens from all social classes who examine cases of lower courts.  All citizens were allowed to attend the General Assembly and revised the Code of Laws of Athens.  Apart from political reforms, he instituted economic reforms as well. He provided different jobs for those can’t farm such as trades and professions. He also introduced new measures and weights.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Framers of the Constitution wanted to protect people's natural nghits.
Levart [38]

Answer:

The answer is :

A English philosopher John Locke.

Explanation:

For Locke, life, liberty and property were natural rights, they existed in the state of nature  and he deemed them as "inalienable," that is, they can´t be surrendered by men.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did most of the uprisings fail in 1848
    11·2 answers
  • The fact that mountains on separate continents appeared to belong to the same chain of mountains, was evidence that, a long time
    6·1 answer
  • Most armies in the 1700s fought during the winter <br><br> TRUE OR FALSE
    15·1 answer
  • When did Charles X become king of France?
    5·2 answers
  • The United States' status of first place among industrial nations was a result, in part, of:
    12·1 answer
  • Places where runaways were fed, clothed, and hidden were often called
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement describes the president's duty as Commander in Chief?
    7·2 answers
  • 5 historical and 5 contemporary examples of nations whose governments are either limited or unlimited governments according to t
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Axum's marketplace develop a blended culture?
    15·1 answer
  • Riots in LA after Rodney king , who is Rodney king​
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!