The answer is D. The Missouri compromise was created to settle the tension between anti and pro slave states.
The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
Answer:
I think it is D
Explanation:
Download this app for answers socratic
B i think bc A is one of the branches
During the 19th century, race moved from religious-based to scientific based. This era resulted in scientists trying to prove that some races are genetically superior to others.
This type of racism called on scientists to take data (like facial features, distance between body parts, shape of head) in order to analyze it. At one point, it was argued that blacks had similar head shapes to that of chimpanzees and monkeys to prove their inferiority.
However, it is widely known now as a science based on false data, exaggerations, and lies in general.
