This is one of those questions that you should always qualify by stating that it is a fact specific inquiry.
Depending on the facts presented, a progressive movement's calls for government regulation may be justified if the facts presented show that the call is justified.
If business is routinely defrauding citizens and ignoring tax law, then a progressive movement is right to call for regulation.
If the regulation is poorly written, then the progressive movement should be calling for better regulation and not new regulation.
This statement is FALSE.
The European Union is constituted by 28 member states, and not all of them are republics. For example, Spain, Belgium and the Netherlands are constitutional monarchies.
It is not a partnership but a form of supranational integration. The level of integration is not as deep as the one that can be found in a federal country like the US. Its member states have established a common market, free movement of people and goods, a common currency, common foreign policy and even certain levels of political integration. Many other aspects such as the fiscal policy, are decided at the state level and the EU has no authority over them.
In reality the [peace] policy rested on the belief that Americans had the right to dispossess Native peoples of their lands, take away freedoms, and send them to reservations, where missionaries would teach them how to farm, read and write, wear Euro-American clothing, and embrace Christianity. If Indians refused to move to reservations, they would be forced off their homelands by soldiers.
The columbian exchange is quite important. This "event" was named after Christopher Columbus and this was used to transfer plants, animals, some culture products or what people used, technology, and pretty much the very basic yet important key things that many people needed. These were all exchanged from America to West Africa, and I believe the Old world. I can't really get the times. But this is the basic information needed.
Have a nice day.
