All categories

3 years ago

How did the Supreme Court ruling affect the Cherokees?

History

1 answer:

Ierofanga [76]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Even as the Supreme Court ruling prohibited it, Cherokees were still removed by the government.

Explanation:

The United States Supreme Court considered that Amerindian tribes were sovereign nations (Cherokee Nation v. Georgia, 1831), and that state laws could not apply to these tribes (Worcester v. Georgia, 1832). President Jackson was deemed, probably wrongfully, to have responded to these convictions: "Marshall made a decision, so let him enforce it." But it is clear that he did not defend the tribes against the decisions of the different states.

The government first negotiated, but only a small part of the people concerned were ready to go hundreds of kilometers to settle on a reserve. It was the American army that finally led a real deportation of the Amerindians, with preliminary gatherings in forts, concentration in large camps and convoys.

This deportation, particularly brutal, took place on forced marches. Thousands of Amerindians died throughout the course, especially among the Cherokee. This displacement became known as the Trail of Tears.

You might be interested in

How were mayor Landrieu’’s actions/decisions courageous?

vredina [299]

Answer:

Because the action received widespread outrage but he stand up to the task even as if it risked his political career.

Explanation:

The Profile of Courage Award is a private award for the appreciation of shows of bravery which is awarded to the people who risked their lives or careers for the national interest. Mitch Landrieu was elected mayor of New Orleans and received this award in 2018 for his leadership in eliminating four Confederate statues in New Orleans. Confederate sympathizers tried every possible means to stop the removal of statues but Landrieu not only did the task but also offered a clear reflection on the institution of slavery and violence underpinning the monuments.

3 0

3 years ago

How did congressional neutrality towards slavery in the federal territories actually stir up sectional strife

dusya [7]

Answer:

The neutrality of the congress generated polarization in the country. This polarization caused states where slavery was prohibited to criticize and devalue states where slavery was allowed, which retaliated against devaluation with further devaluation.

Explanation:

When Congress decided to stay neutral in relation to slavery in the country, Congressmen believed that this would generate peace in the country, as each state would have autonomy to decide whether it wanted to use slaves or not.

However, the result could not have been more different. Neutrality generated polarization and many conflicts between countries that allowed slaves and prohibited slaves. Countries that did not allow slavery criticized, devalued and tried to interfere with the autonomy of the states that allowed slavery. The slaves who allowed slavery did not tolerate this interference and retaliated as best they could, in addition to promoting a strong devaluation in relation to free countries.

8 0

3 years ago

Would someone mind helping me? I really need this answer but I'm so confused. I would appreciate any help :) and if you get the

olchik [2.2K]

Answer:

C is correct

Explanation:

Athens was a democracy where all male citizens had equal political rights.

4 0

3 years ago

What was the benefit of calling all of Europe to join the crusades

Archy [21]

Answer:

Pope Urban II launches the Crusades by calling all Christians in Europe to war against Muslims in order to reclaim the Holy Land.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

How would the United States and either the United Kingdom or Russia approach an international crisis, and which method is best?

sweet [91]

Answer: How did the US and Soviet Union confront each other around the world during the Cold War? ... The US supported the invasion of Cuba and blockaded Cuba in order to get the Soviets to remove nuclear missiles. The US followed the policy of containment, which was a strategy to keep communism from spreading. The United States government was initially hostile to the Soviet leaders for taking Russia out of World War I and was opposed to a state ideologically based on communism. ... However, the Soviet stance on human rights and its invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 created new tensions between the two countries. How were the United States and the Soviet Union alike during the Cold War? ... The greatest difference between the two countries was simply that American citizens generally thrived because of free market economic policy, whereas Russians suffered under the inefficiencies of their command economy.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago