The phrase from the paragraph that best supports the answer to Part A about the text "Would You Marry a Stranger?" is "Millions of people have had arranged..."
<h3>What is the text about?</h3>
The text "Would You Marry a Stranger?" is about arranged marriages around the world. As explained in the text, this practice is more common than we can imagine here in the Western world, and also more successful than we would expect.
In Part A, we are asked what the central idea of the text is. The best answer seems to be:
- Arranged marriages are about as successful as autonomous marriages because they are so widespread.
The phrase from the paragraph that best supports our answer to Part A is the following:
- “Millions of people have had arranged marriages in the past, and millions still engage in the practice today.” (Paragraph 4)
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about "Would You Marry a Stranger?" here:
brainly.com/question/16203904
#SPJ1
Answer:
Today's GPS receivers are extremely accurate (to 10–20 m), thanks to their parallel multi-channel design; a 12-channel receiver, for instance, can lock onto 12 satellites. Certain atmospheric factors and other sources of error can affect the receiver's accuracy.
Answer: She told a Boston newspaper reporter that she was deliberately "trying to give [her guests] something different." Using an ice pick, she broke a semi-sweet chocolate bar into small pieces and mixed them into the batter
Explanation: I did the quiz and I got it right lol (and don’t for get to rate it)
Answer:
There’s an eerie symmetry between Donald Trump and The Great Gatsby’s Tom Buchanan, as if the villain of F. Scott Fitzgerald’s 1925 novel had been brought to life in a louder, gaudier guise for the 21st century. It’s not just their infamous carelessness, the smashing-up of things and creatures that propels Tom’s denouement and has seemed to many a Twitter user to be the animating force behind Trump’s policy and personnel decisions. The two men, real and fictional, mirror each other in superficial but telling ways. Tom moves like Trump, aggressive and restless, and talks like him, with ponderous pride. He picks personal fights in public, “as though … it would be a privilege to partake vicariously of [his] emotions.” Tom surprises his dinner guests with disjointed political speeches, warning insistently that “civilization’s going to pieces.” His patrician mannerisms are shot through with flashes of anxiety, “as if his complacency, more acute than of old, was not enough to him any more.”
Running out the door into the yard is the gerund phrase