<span>The correct answer is that their processes were lengthy unlike many other colonies where a swift revolution ended it all. For example, Belize fought for its independence for over 20 years, and it ended with the UN asking for independence. Macau had 4 talks over 10 years regarding its transfer of sovereignty from the Portuguese government and it ended successfully. </span>
Answer:
Although Belgium did colonize other parts of the world it wasn't close to the amount of land grabbed by the other 3 empires so I would say Belgium.
Explanation:
The Byzantine emperor would have collapsed then a new monarch would have been put into place. Byzantium required a balance between church and state, the two headed eagle, so there would have had to be a new emperor, who might have a different control over the people for the better or worse.
- <em><u>COPY PASTED EDITED</u></em>
Among benefits of the ethnic, language and religious diversity in Africa one may single out the ability to learn from the different ethnic groups and build interconnections between them, thus establishing a successful, well-functioning multicultural society.
Speaking about pitfalls, when one deals with such a great cultural diversity, there is always a possibility of disagreement on the cultural ground, which may in the worst case even lead to murder, for instance, when there is a collision of religious viewpoints.
