Answer:Trying to resolve a problem without being controlling
Explanation:
His dad is using a control strategy as a form of resolving his son's laziness which has no positive influence if one is trying to discipline someone or show them a right path.
A supportive climate should create a positive atmosphere where someone doesn't feel that they are under control of another person but they should be able to see where they went wrong whilst they can also feel supported.
The physical development of the individual corresponds to the research focus of a developmental psychologist, who seeks to identify the capabilities and limitations of the human body.
<h3 /><h3>Developmental Psychology</h3>
It is defined as the study of how individuals grow and adapt to their environment and experiences across life stages. Psychologists conduct research that assists in the achievement of physical and cognitive skills that may limit an individual to having mental and physical health.
Therefore, through research related to development, it is possible to increase understanding about an individual, their motivations and needs.
The correct answer is:
Find out more information about developmental psychologist here:
brainly.com/question/5039386
Around 6.6% is the answer
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
