He was not informed fo his right to consult with an attorney before and or during an interrogation, and he was not informed of his right not to self incriminate. Nor was he informed of his right to remain silent. Basically, the police didn't even read him his Miranda rights.
It was a monarchy which means a king was in power. there were many small rebublica in ancient india which had some democracy in their administration. members of the council of minister could give advice to the king but all final desicions were left to the king . hope this helps!
The correct answer is: Option B. It was impossible to separate government into equal branches.
The Anti-Federalists stated that a strong, centralized federal government would equate tyranny, and therefore its powers needed to be divided in separate branches. These individuals sought to minimize the power of the centralized government, and at the same time, provide more to the state governments.
