Answer:
The USSR created the Warsaw Pact
Explanation:
this was their reaction to the creation of NATO, representing their power over NATO.
Answer:
(C) land ownership.
Explanation:
To have a land of their own was key for European settlers, since back in their homeland they were unable to do so (they were poor), and land ownership was equivalent to wealth. The more land a person owned, the more powerful and richer he was. Offering such dreamland was the premise for English companies to encourage potential settlers to travel to America.
On the opposite, North American Indians did not believe in land ownership. Everybody was free to own land to live and grow crops in it. They coexisted with nature and constantly moved from land to land, enabling it to recover from their farming activities.
These differences resulted in cruelty towards North American Indians, leading to armed conflicts between them and European settlers.
You didn’t list any accounts, but I can provide some examples.
The automatic incorrect answers are American accounts and Japanese accounts are those are both the receivers and attacker’s.
Their allies in the war also might not be as well as they can be biased towards their ally.
However, neutral countries could be very unbiased as they have no allies and were not involved.
Hope this helps!
The idea of monotheism is greatly accepted today and allowed for the many forms of Christianity along with the practice of Judaism and other monotheistic practices
Answer:
While West and East Africa Kingdoms grew political power from the wealth provided by trade, the political relationships in Inland Africa grew out of kin-based networks where families would govern themselves.
Explanation:
The political structure in the Kingdoms of Inland Africa didn´t centralize the power under a single authority. Instead, every city-state had kin-based networks with a male chief who would mediate in social conflicts and represent his network in front of other groups.