The most important factor explaining why the Portuguese were the first in Europe to pursue overseas exploration and discovery was effective leadership.
Leadership:
- The ability of a person, group, or organization to "lead," influence, or direct other people, groups, or entire organizations is referred to as leadership, both as a field of study and as a practical talent.
- Regardless of your position in the organization, you can develop your leadership skills at any level. They are crucial traits to possess because a competent leader can inspire his or her team to work together toward a common objective by bringing out the best qualities in each person.
- Leading an organization's resources toward increased efficiency and goal achievement is a crucial management job. Effective leaders set clear objectives and inspire and guide their staff to achieve the objectives of the organization.
Learn more about leadership here brainly.com/question/1232764
#SPJ4
He played for the Brooklyn dogers<span />
The Berlin wall was a barrier that existed from 1961 to 1989 throughout conflict and separated East and city district. It symbolized the distinction between western democrats and jap communists (end of soviet domination) and therefore the method they thought FRG ought to be lead. Fall of Berlin wall could be a major event in European history. The policies of restructuring and openness initiated by soviet leader Mikhail opened the trail for the destruction of the symbolic physical barrier.
The contribution that the Catholic Church hopes this helps
Answer:
I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.
Explanation:
