Answer:
It is not a Type I error neither a Type II error.
Step-by-step explanation:
Let 
be the true mean match score. The null hypothesis is 
and the alternative hypothesis is 
(upper-tail alternative). When the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when actually is equal to 80 a Type I error is made. On the other hand, when the test shows that the mean match score is equal to 80 when actually is more than 80 a type II error is made. Therefore, when the test shows that the mean match score is more than 80 when the person does not actually have a fingerprint match, does not correspond to a Type I error neither to a Type II error.
The best way to multiply complicated problems mentally* is to break them into chunks.
Start with 20 times 8 to get 160, and then 8 times 5 to get 40. Add these together to get 200. 200 times 3 is 600, and 20 times 200 is 4000. Add these together to get your final answer, 4600.
In other words 8 x 20 + 8 x 5 = 200 200 x 3 + 200 x 20 = 4600
*I assumed you meant mentally, because otherwise you'd just multiply longhand, multiplying two of the three numbers and then multiplying their product with the third.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
8 x 6 = 48 because you just add a 1
Answer:
The maximum safe rescue height is 104.6 feet above the height of the ground.
Step-by-step explanation:
Consider a triangle ABC where C is the point where the rescue ladder is standing and AB be the building and Ladder making an angle of 72° as shown.
We have to find the height of the building.
Let x be the height of building
Using Trigonometric ratio,
So, the maximum safe rescue height is 104.6 feet above the height of
the ground.
The associative property of addition is shown in equations where the order in which the evaluation is made does not change the result, providing the numbers remain in the same order. Option B demonstrates this.
