1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ioda
3 years ago
8

PLEASE HELP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

English
2 answers:
melamori03 [73]3 years ago
7 0

Both unethical I think they decided to collaborate on an individual assignment

algol133 years ago
3 0

This seems like unethical collaboration because it was explicitly specified that the assignment should be completed individually

You might be interested in
What does the shift in point of view allow the author of "The Lady or the Tiger?" to do as the story ends? A. By shifting to "yo
kap26 [50]
I would say c since he asked in the end sentence.
<span>
"And so I leave it with all of you: Which came out of the opened door - the lady, or the tiger?"</span>

6 0
2 years ago
How does Polyphemus prevent Odysseus and his men from leaving his cave?
fredd [130]
He set a giant boulder at the mouth of the cave.
8 0
2 years ago
NO LINKS OR BE READY FOR A REPORT!!!!!, ill give brainliest for the fist person to answer whit no links.
Finger [1]

Answer:

In May 1944, the Nazis deported 15-year-old Wiesel and his family to Auschwitz, a concentration camp in Poland. Wiesel's mother and the youngest of his three sisters died at Auschwitz, while he and his father later were moved to another camp, Buchenwald, located in Germany.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Choose the correct preposition from
Sloan [31]

Answer:

We are proud of our country.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A summary of the new Jim Crow book version
enot [183]

Alexander details the history of “racialized social control” (20). From slavery to Jim Crow to mass incarceration, she identifies a persistent pattern by which systems of racial subjugation are built, maintained, dismantled, and finally transformed to fit the circumstances of a given era. In the case of mass incarceration, politicians like Ronald Reagan built the system to fit into a new post-Civil Rights Movement paradigm that prohibited politicians from making overtly racist appeals to American voters. In this new era of supposed colorblindness, Reagan—and later George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton—utilized “law and order” (50) rhetoric that implicitly demonized Black men as predators. In the middle of Reagan’s presidency, crack cocaine swept through urban communities of color, giving “tough on crime” advocates the perfect pretext to launch an aggressive drug enforcement campaign against Black American males.

 Alexander explains exactly how the new racial caste system works, beginning with its point of entry: the police. Empowered by Supreme Court decisions that effectively gutted the Fourth Amendment, police officers may stop and search individuals under the faintest pretexts of probable cause. Yet just because police departments can target millions of Americans suspected of possessing small amounts of drugs, the question remains of why they choose to divert time and resources away from addressing more serious crimes like murders and rapes. Alexander points to huge financial incentives offered by the federal government to encourage widespread enforcement of minor drug infractions. Massive federal cash grants and changes to civil asset forfeiture laws have made participation in the drug war extraordinarily lucrative for state and local police departments.

In the following chapter Alexander explores why, in many states, Black Americans make up as much as 80% to 90% of individuals who serve time in prison on drug charges, even though the system is formally colorblind and whites use and sell drugs at similar rates. Unlike in the case of robberies or assaults, where clear victims exist, those involved with drug transactions are unlikely to report them to the police because doing so would implicate themselves in a crime. As a result, police must be proactive in addressing drug crime and are therefore afforded an enormous amount of discretion concerning whom to target. As for why police departments choose to disproportionately target people of color, Alexander blames both implicit biases and pervasive media and political campaigns that frame Black men as criminals in the American imagination. Prosecutors are also granted an outsized amount of discretion thanks to the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences for drug criminals. With such harsh sentences hanging over the heads of those charged with drug crimes, prosecutors are better empowered to extract plea deals. While these plea deals may keep an individual out of jail, they also frequently result in a felony record, saddling that person for life with what Alexander calls “the prison label” (189). The consequences of this prison label are the focus of Chapter 4. When an individual leaves prison or accepts a felony plea deal, they face legal discrimination in employment, housing, welfare benefits, and often voting rights. It is here that Alexander observes the strongest similarities between mass incarceration and the Jim Crow era, given that Black Americans faced these same forms of discrimination during the first half of the 20th century in the South. She also addresses the stigma felt by everyone touched by the criminal justice system, which includes the formerly incarcerated, their families, and any individual who can expect daily harassment from police officers. The following chapter outlines the specific similarities and differences between Jim Crow and mass incarceration. Aside from the legal discrimination in both systems, Jim Crow and mass incarceration have similar political roots. Both systems gained political support from elites who sought to exploit the economic and cultural fears of poor and working-class whites. Both operate by defining what it means to be Black in America in the cultural imagination—in the case of mass incarceration, that means defining Black men as criminals. Perhaps the most significant and frightening difference is that while both slavery and Jim Crow were systems of labor exploitation, mass incarceration involves marginalization and removal from society. Alexander points out that similar racially based marginalization efforts were precursors to genocides in the 20th century.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • ‼️‼️I NEED HELP NOW‼️‼️
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the words below would be another acceptable term to describe the tone of "The Winter's Drive?"
    10·2 answers
  • To spell the word believable, why is the final e dropped from the base word believe?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of a synonym chain?
    14·1 answer
  • What line of longitude runs through the state of Texas​
    12·1 answer
  • What is the MOST likely reason the author included the singalong in Boston? (A) to introduce the idea that people are finding ne
    6·1 answer
  • In “The Fish,” Elizabeth Bishop uses simile and metaphor to deve tone. Select one simile and one metaph or from the poem, and ex
    8·1 answer
  • Please help + brainliesting
    15·1 answer
  • During the _______ of a debate, the participants consider each other’s positions and arguments. A. introduction B. body C. rebut
    14·2 answers
  • What is the antecedent is this sentence the girl saw the bike she always wanted
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!