The best ground on which the defendant ( Company S ) can dismiss the suit filed by the plaintiff (Company T) is the standing to sue.
<h3>What is standing to sue?</h3>
Standing to sue refers to a situation where the plaintiff who has filed the case must prove with appropriate proof of having damages or injuries in respect of the conduct of the defendant.
In the provided case, Company T has to prove that the products of Company S are actually defective through appropriate evidence. If Company T can't able to prove their alleged claim before the court, then the case is decided in the favor of the defendant party, that is, Company S.
Therefore, the standing to sue can be used as a ground by Company S for dismissing the claim of Company T.
Learn more about the standing to sue in the related link:
brainly.com/question/14820416
#SPJ4
Answer:
WACC = 11.13%
Explanation:
total market value common stocks = 31,500 x $78 = $2,457,000
total market value of preferred stock = 7,250 x $94.50 = $685,125
total market value of debt = $401,000 x 1.105 = $443,105
total = $3,575,230
Rcs = 13.05%
Rps = $7.70 / $94.50 = 8.15%
Rd = 8.05%
WACC = ($2,457,000/$3,575,230 x 13.05%) + ($685,125/$3,575,230 x 8.15%) + ($443,105/$3,575,230 x 8.05% x 60%) = 8.968% + 1.562% + 0.6% = 11.13%
Answer:
A. Consider all indirect manufacturing costs
B. Consider all manufacturing costs
C. Consider non manufacturing costs
Explanation:
A) Manufacturing overhead.
Consider all indirect manufacturing costs
B) Product costs.
Consider all manufacturing costs
C) Period costs.
Consider non manufacturing costs
Answer: True- The comparative advantage in the dish washing
Explanation:
Yes, the given statement is true that both the coworkers that is Rodney and Yvonne determining the comparative advantages in the store by washing all the dishes.
The comparative advantages is one of the term that is used to refers to the economical ability that helps in providing the various types of products and also reflecting the overall production opportunity in terms of cost.
Accordion to the given scenario, we use the comparative advantages for determining the person for washing the dishes from both the co-workers.
Therefore, The given answer is correct.
