Answer:
A
Explanation:
because it involves borrowing
The point of origin of a suspected arson fire is the place the most physical proof might be found demonstrating flame of flammable nature. There might be different purposes of starting point that prompts evident indications of fire related crime. These purposes of sources are one of the more evident variables that prompts the doubt from flame warriors at a scene that starts an illegal conflagration examination.
Answer:
Calvinism and the Social Contract Theory: Many individuals who lived in the New England area were Calvinists or heavily influenced by John Calvin's works and thought. While many look at John Locke as the primary founder of the idea of the social contract (which defined proper government as an agreement or contract between the individuals to join together into a society), the Calvinist doctrine was one of the first to espouse the idea in England.
Explanation-
connecticut, rhode island, and new hampshire are all new england colonies
The answer would be nominal interest.
<h3>
Hello there!</h3><h3>
Answer: I would say grant the motion that the salesperson filed</h3>
The reason why I would say that the court rule for the sales person by grating the motion because the elderly lady wasn't very specific in her claim.
The elderly women would need to have more proof or evidence on how the salesperson made fraudulent statements that made her sign the contract.
The plaintiff, or elderly women's "claim for relief" would not specify the outcome that the elderly women wants to see in court. This would make her statement "insufficient."
If the elderly women told the court what outcome she wanted in the court and what she would do with the outcome would've possibly have the court lean towards her, but since she didn't have that, they would possibly grant the motion that was filed by the salesperson.
<h3>I hope this helps!</h3><h3>Best regards,</h3><h3>MasterInvestor</h3>
