Answer:
A and B -----> A Bill of Rights and Article I, II, and III to separate powers in the government
Explanation:
My position on the use of presidential pardon authority is of favourability; because this was granted by the Constitution which represents the Americans desires and philosophy of how the govern should act for the citizens and states interests and dreams.
Pardons tend to be controversial because as they overlay justice decisions the President can use the pardon and offer it for a person in the purpose of fulfilling, or attend his own interest or causes. Taking advantage of pardon for personal benefits.
One actual example of a president’s use of his pardon authority was the pardon granted for Former President Richard Nixon by President Gerald Ford on September 8, 1974 regarding any crimes he could have done in Watergate Scandal.
The pardon legally relates to punishment effects for a crime (if it is offered before a conviction it prevents the penalties and disabilities and if it is after a conviction it removes them).
The emotional issues that those most personally affected by the original crime may have toward the granting of a pardon can be vary.
In the case of Nixon critics claimed the pardon to be a “corrupt bargain” and later this seems to be the cause of peoples rejection of Ford and reason of the President losing the elections of 1976. While for Nixon was a great relive and an import act this pardon Ford gave him.
Great Britain=A
France=A
Germany=C
United States=A
Russia=A
Austria-Hungary=C
Hope this helped :)
At the Okaya Silk Factory, the employees were allowed fifteen minutes for lunch, between 10.30 and 10.45, and a ten-minute break from 3.30 to 3.40.
Even though the conditions in the factories were clean, warm, and free of the climactic elements, <u>they were kept on the job till 7.30 p.m.</u> for a total of fourteen hours and twenty minutes. The workers were kept until 10 p.m. when the plan was particularly busy.
Hope it helps!
