The purpose of the New Jersey Plan, proposed in June 1787, was to support the interests of the smaller states in the nation, in opposition to Virginia's plan, which argued for a powerful national government. William Paterson, the representative of New Jersey, presented the plan during the Committee of the Whole debates, which ran from June 16 to 19.
<h3>Further explanation</h3>
Let us summarise in a few points the main differences between these two plans, which represent two opposing visions for the future of the United States.
- The New Jersey plan defends a decision made by the states, the plan of Virginia defends that is the whole people who should decide thanks to the election of representatives.
- The New Jersey plan wants the states to have all the same number of representatives in parliament, Virginia's plan is that larger states have more representatives than smaller ones.
- The New Jersey plan prefers an executive power shared by several persons, Virginia's plan, the executive power in the hands of a single president.
- The New Jersey plan wants state laws to pass the laws of the country, Virginia's plan that the laws of the country be superior to all others.
It is finally the plan of Virginia which is adopted with 7 votes against 3. So, the United States moves towards a centralized decision and powerful big states, with small states relegated to the background.
<h3>Learn more</h3>
- How the US Congress works: brainly.com/question/3217978
- Facts about Virginia plan: brainly.com/question/2492
- The United States first governments: brainly.com/question/5148187
<h3>Answer details</h3>
Grade: 9 - 12
Subject: History
Chapter: The Birth of an American Empire
Keywords: New Jersey plan, Committee of the whole, the US politic, the United States congress history, Virginia Plan
Answer:
However, Prime Minister Charles Maurice de Talleyrand of France insulted the American diplomats by first refusing to officially receive them. He then demanded a $250,000 personal bribe and a $10 million loan for his financially strapped country before he would begin peace negotiations.
Explanation:
Answer: racially segregated but ostensibly ensuring equal opportunities to all races.
"the decision terminated the “separate but equal” doctrine that made racially segregated schools legal"
Accommodations provided on each railroad car were required to be the same as those provided on the others. Separate railroad cars could be provided. The railroad could refuse service to passengers who refused to comply, and the Supreme Court ruled this did not infringe upon the 13th and 14th amendments.
Each of these events and actions dealt with the extension of slavery into the western territories. The Missouri Compromise (1820) banned slavery 36 degrees latitude. The Compromise of 1850 allowed for popular sovereignty (voters decide) in the Mexican Cession territory.
You need to give more information on the question.
