D. It protected rights by ending quotas but allowing race be an admissions factor.
In <em>Regents of the University of California v. Bakke </em>(1978), the Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program. But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, with schools needing to practice great care in doing so. Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is FALSE that The Supreme Court has ruled that the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance violates the separation of church and state.
This is because there is no legal case yet in which the Supreme Court ruled that the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance violates the separation of church and state.
Two important groups are Indians and Hispanics.
The purpose was to make the economy and the military stronger, to do that, banks needed to be built, so, if the money was flowing was, that meant the economy was good, and more money was coming to the government. They can use that to strengthen the country defenses.
Egypt i did this before and this the answers
