1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksana_A [137]
3 years ago
11

What is rural life like for many Haitians

History
1 answer:
Morgarella [4.7K]3 years ago
5 0
because it's not good for you you can like do stuff
You might be interested in
According to myers, in 2003 american and british leaders justified attacking iraq not as a hostile effort to kill iraqis, but as
zlopas [31]
Instrumental or cognitive aggression: these terms are interchangeable, both meaning the aggression is planned and is used as a means to meet a goal that can't be achieved in any other way. 

Instrumental aggression is a planned attack and is typically the one means left. It is seen as necessary as no other plan has worked to achieve the goal. It is thought out and even justified by a higher moral grounds. 
4 0
3 years ago
The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What reactions do you think the governments of Great Britain and Mexico had to the American idea of Manifest Destiny?​
Aleonysh [2.5K]

Answer: their reactions to the Manifest Destiny idea was war

Explanation:

also brainliest plz

6 0
3 years ago
Who gained the territories that rome lost
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

There was an on going battle for it but eventually Hungary won then the Romanians took over Transylvania  which would have been part of Rome.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
About what percent of slaves died while in route to the new world from Africa?
Oksanka [162]
It was 17% of slaves. Because during travel some died crossing the route. Like Antarctica. Since they didn't have much clothing they died from frost bite or hypothermia.  <span />
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Possible to discern among these the true source of presidential power
    12·1 answer
  • Why was the united states unable to remain neutral during ww1?
    12·1 answer
  • How is democracy different than a country ruled by a king
    10·2 answers
  • A group of students have a total of 29 pencils and everyone has at least one pencil each and the rest have 2 pencils each.How ma
    5·1 answer
  • Pick any 3 of the items from the list below, and explain how each chosen event changed the American colonists’ perceptions of Br
    8·1 answer
  • Give meanings of the the following word Accession​
    6·1 answer
  • Is the group of citizens usually 23 that determine if there is sufficient evidence to proceed to
    11·1 answer
  • Why did Britain took lead in the industrial revolution
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the united states seiz pacific islands during world war ll?
    14·1 answer
  • Based on the constitutional clause identified in part A, explain why the facts of McCulloch v. Maryland led to a different holdi
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!