Answer:
Retroactive interference
Explanation:
Interference: In psychology, the term interference is referred to as the phenomenon in which a particular piece of information interferes in a way to recall.
Retroactive interference: The term retroactive interference is defined as the phenomenon in which a recent information interferes when an individual tries to recall the previous or older information. It happens when an individual finds difficulty when trying to recall older information due to the presence of newer information.
In the question above, the given statement is an example of retroactive interference.
I think the toxic sludge is a fine addition. If someone were to remove the toxic sludge then I sure wouldn't be happy. The toxic sludge isn't hurting anybody, why should they remove it? It's the people who are a threat to the toxic sludge, not the other way around.
Answer:
<em>(A) the estimated population
</em>
Explanation:
The best way to deal with this is to avoid the plural pronoun ' their, ' which has no place in this sense as we're talking about the rhino (a singular) group.
Therefore options B and E are removed.
In terms of ' amount ' we do not quantify a population. Therefore, option C is also removed.
In D the estimation of population is odd.
<em>The correct version is the projected population. A is the right choice.</em>
The correct answer is letter A. <span>high unemployment. </span>Hungary did not face high unemployment in converting to a free market system. Having a high unemployment rate is not a problem in Hungary when they convert into free market system.