Answer:
there may be grave consequences for taking advantage of others.
It suggests a much-deserved justice
Explanation:
brainliest pls
Answer: No change is needed
Explanation: This is because the first one would make it seem like you can either have sand or water when you need both. The second one contradicts earlier when it says that you need the sand making it seem you don't later on. The third one sounds like it is saying you either need all the materials or time when you need all of these things. So the last one is correct. This sentence already makes sense
The correct answer is A. I am sure. Hope it helps:)
<u>Answer:</u>
The writer can correct the parallelism in three simple ways but first let’s learn what is this parallelism. Elements which are grammatically same in meaning, sound or meter are included in the sentences. This method gives a writing piece a balance it deserves.
Now, if this technique goes wrong, how can it be corrected?
<u>Let’s explain with an example:
</u>
<em>Mita likes mangoes, apples and going to the theatre.
</em>
Here, the word “likes” acts as the trigger for a parallel structure and the phrase “going to” is wrong as it is having a different grammatical structure.
<u>This can be corrected in three ways:
</u>
<em>By making the grammatically incorrect part match with the other parts: </em>
Mita likes mangoes, apples and theatres.
<em>By making the other parts match with the grammatically incorrect part: </em>
Mita likes eating mangoes, eating apples and going to the theatre.
<em>By splitting the sentence: </em>
Mita likes eating mangoes and apples. She also likes going to the theatre.
