A. Mali because Mansa Musa was the conqueror of the Mali empire
American settlers started moving west because they wanted a better life, a big factor of settlers moving west was also for land since it was very cheap, also gold and mining opportunities.
Military: Germany was limited to a very small military (no more than 100,000 men of all ranks), and was not allowed to have any heavy artillery. This was to prevent Germany from gaining a military strong enough to launch another attack, but since a strong military was a very important part of remaining a world power, this meant Germany could never hope to achieve this whilst honoring the treaty.
Economic: Germany was forced to pay reparations (as they were being blamed for the war) to many countries, mainly Belgium and France. The amount was far to much for Germany to ever pay off, and was a key factor in Germany's economic crisis shortly thereafter.
Territorial: Germany was forced to give up all of it's colonies, which were given to various League of Nations powers. This was a major loss of land and population for the country, not to mention a loss of money from said colonies, again leading back to economics.
Answer:
The answer is "Greek"
Explanation:
Social contract theory, almost as old as philosophy itself, is the view that people's good or potentially political commitments are needy upon an agreement or arrangement among them to shape the general public in which they live. Socrates use something very like an Social contract theory to disclose to Crito why he should stay in jail and acknowledge capital punishment. Nonetheless, Social contract theory is properly connected with current good and political hypothesis and is given its first full work and guard by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the most popular defenders of this gigantically persuasive hypothesis, which has been one of the most predominant speculations inside good and political hypothesis since the commencement of the cutting edge West. In the 20th century, good and political hypothesis recaptured philosophical force because of John Rawls' Kantian rendition of implicit understanding hypothesis, and was trailed by new examinations of the subject by David Gauthier and others.
All the more as of late, thinkers from alternate points of view have offered new reactions of implicit understanding hypothesis. Specifically, women's activists and race-cognizant thinkers have contended that Social contract theory is in any event an inadequate image of our good and political lives, and may truth be told disguise a portion of the manners by which the agreement is itself parasitical upon the oppression of classes of people.
Answer:
Explanation:
I think this question is rooted in WWII when the Japanese were being put into interment camps- so I will answer based on that. The United States, regardless of race, has no justification to take away the rights of its citizens. Even in times of war, someone needs to be accused of being a spy with actual hard <em>evidence</em> before they should be subjected to that.
