The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
"<span>the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand" is thought to be the spark that lit the powder-keg </span>of war at the beginning of the 20th century. A dense web of alliances was set off from this shooting.
The New Deal reform that helped labor unions win the right to represent workers was the "(3) passage of the National Labor Relations <span>(Wagner) Act" but there were other things as well. </span>
The first two statementz are the true ones because in the revolution, the french saw america as a weeb country. but once they saw how well america was doing against Britain, they chose to help america by giving aid and weapons.
and without the help of the French, america really would have lost the war because they were losing soldiers fast due to lack of resoures and disease lol.
plus the third one is wrong because the question os asking for US & France not France & Britain smh :)
jew..........................
