1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krok68 [10]
3 years ago
11

What is a possible drawback to direct democracy? How might it be resolved?

History
1 answer:
aliina [53]3 years ago
5 0

A drawback might be that there are a lot of people that need to vote in the country of a direct democracy. That is a lot of numbers to keep track of and a lot of time dedicated just to voting.


This could be resolved through an easier way of counting the votes and keeping track of the people who have already voted, such as online voting. It could also make it easier to have smaller districts or groups of people vote in more places around the country. This would make keeping track of people easier. It would also bring down the number of votes that were in each area, reducing the amount of time it takes to count all of the votes.

You might be interested in
Which person has the best chance of influencing local legislation?
Anarel [89]

Answer:

C. "Better after-school programs"

Explanation:

All the other influencers are talking about NATIONAL business. Local legislation doesn't address foreign policy, nat'l income tax, or voting age requirements.

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the progressive movement support the direct election of senators?
kykrilka [37]

Answer:

the correct answer is c

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
1. India was considered the in the crown of Britain. ​
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

I guess where is the question

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Western Church and the Eastern Church differed in what area?
luda_lava [24]
The western church and the eastern church differed in :
A. beliefs
unlike the western, The eastern church evolved into a more orthodox style catholic churches

hope this helps
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the civil war New Orleans was significant because it was
Gelneren [198K]
New Orleans was significant during the Civil War, because the city was divided. The northern part was controlled by the Union Army, but the southern part was still Confederate so they were spared from the Emancipation Proclamation. Many cities in the South were destroyed, but New Orleans was largely spared. Many African-American troops fought for the North and most of New Orleans was captured and controlled by the Union Army early on in the war.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened on kristallnacht
    7·2 answers
  • Imagine that you are an educated citizen of an imperialist European nation in the 19th century. You have not yet formed a well-t
    11·1 answer
  • What position did the strict constructionists take in the early years under the constitution? the liberal constructionists? whic
    7·1 answer
  • Are you a fan of dua lipa cause i an plz go follow me on insa dualiparockslol ok thanks
    5·2 answers
  • What is the area like in northern Asia?
    10·1 answer
  • Moses tells Pharaoh to
    13·2 answers
  • im working on a time line project about european exploration. can someone help me pick some key events and dates i could use.
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes right of US Citizens
    6·1 answer
  • Which Native American group was the first of the modern Native American tribes to live in Oklahoma?
    15·1 answer
  • What was life like for women in Athens?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!