1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
3 years ago
6

What is the role of a judge in a jury trial? A. The judge listens to both sides of the case to make a recommendation to the jury

of what outcome to decide.. . B. The judge makes sure the evidence is presented fairly and that the jurors understand the law and procedures.. . C. The judge chooses who will serve on the jury and will consider the recommendation of the jury in a bench trial.. . D. The judge selects what evidence may be shown at trial and what evidence will be reserved for the appeals court.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
7 0
The correct answer among all the other choices is B. The judge makes sure the evidence is presented fairly and that the jurors understand the law and procedures. This is the role of a judge in a jury trial. Thank you for posting your question. I hope this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help. 
You might be interested in
Why did Christianity appeal to many Romans? Give a detailed response
maksim [4K]

There are at least three reasons why historians might conclude that Christianity appealed more to many Romans than the old Roman religion did.  We must remember that these are ideas that historians propose and not necessarily those that religious people would accept.  Actual Romans might have said they preferred Christianity because God spoke to their hearts and told them it was true.  Historians have to be more cynical and look for worldly causes for religious belief.

One reason that Romans might have liked Christianity is because its god cared about people.  Roman religion was based on transactions.  If people performed certain actions, the gods would perform other actions in return.  It was like buying something on Amazon.  By contrast, in Christianity, God loves all people regardless of what they do or believe.  God hopes that people will do the right thing and will punish them if they do wrong, but he loves them as individuals even when they do bad things.  Historians say that Romans might have liked this idea because it fed their emotional need to feel that they were valuable and worth caring about.

A second factor in Christianity’s popularity might have been its moral code.  Roman religion really did not say much if anything about how people should act in their daily lives.  The gods did not care how people acted towards one another.  The Christian god, on the other hand, handed down a strict set of rules about how people were to behave.  This might have made people like Christianity because it made them feel that they had instructions about how to live their lives.

Finally, historians emphasize Christianity’s inclusive nature.  The Roman world was very unequal.  There were a few elites, a group of people who were well-off, and many, many poor people and slaves.  The Roman religion did not give any of the people of the lower classes a sense that they were valuable.  This is where Christianity was so different.  It taught that all people are equal in the eyes of God.  Historians believe that this would have made many people like the idea of Christianity because it gave them hope that god cared about them regardless of their status and that they, the “meek” would one day inherit the earth.

Historians suggest all of these as reasons why people in Roman times might have been attracted to Christianity.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would you solve Waverly's budgeting issue?
dezoksy [38]

Answer:

Yrhrhrhrh

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
How does the neighborhood one calls home affect a poor person's life chances? how does the study "moving to opportunity" add to
kumpel [21]

This neighborhood we call home affects poor people´s life because it changes the point of view of a poor person about what is home for him or her. This person realized that there are another ways to live in this world and that some of them are really difficult for him or her to achieve. This can influence him or her in different ways like, it can motivate him or her to work harder and try his or her best so as to modify his meaning of home and get another one that may be better for him or her. It can also not motivate him or her and make this person feel like he or she has no way to get to our lifestyle and make her or him stalledwhere they are.

The study "Moving to Opportunity" adds to our understanding of poverty that we have a different meaning of poverty than other people. For example for some people being poor is not to get to pay the bills, or have no home or not being ableto buy food for their family. But for other people being poor is not being able to afford a holidays trip, or not buying the newest car or not getting the newest cellphone. Every person lives a different reality and has different ways to get to their objectives, but what we need to know is that sometimes we get worried about not getting the last cellphone or the last house or car on the market while some people are worried about how the are going to get a home for their family and how are they going to bring food to their tables. The luxuries and the material things are not always the most important in our life and we have to appreciate what we have and take care of it.

3 0
3 years ago
South african laws that legally and forcibly separated people of different ethnic and racial backgrounds were known as
ollegr [7]
<em>Apartheid laws</em>. There was some truly horrific racial segregation going on in South Africa until fairly recently in its history, many South Africans still live with its legacy. Colonialism and imperialism had far-reaching and nearly universally negative consequences on the African Continent, not least of which being its ideas of racial superiority/inferiority.
7 0
3 years ago
Who would not enforce worchester v. georgia ? i will mark brainloest for right answer
Aneli [31]

Answer:

Georgia officials ignored the court's decision, President Andrew Jackson refused to enforce it, and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 to facilitate the eviction of tribal members from their homes and territory. Removal was implemented by 7,000 troops commanded by General Winfield Scott.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is human capital? ​
    5·2 answers
  • An election held to vote directly on a ballot proposition concerning a law or constitutional amendment passed by the legislature
    6·2 answers
  • Describe at least one way in which the legislative branch is able to influence the actions of the judicial branch and at least o
    14·2 answers
  • What is the difference between the national wilderness refuge and national wilderness area
    10·1 answer
  • Known as the "Wizard of Menlo Park," he is famous for his hundred of inventions, including the incandescent light bulb, phonogra
    11·2 answers
  • When two people engage in a conversation, if one person produces a specific grammatical construction in her speech and then the
    5·1 answer
  • Voting age in india is
    13·1 answer
  • Harry and the prisoner of azkaban when some slytherins dressed as dementors at the quidditch match harry
    7·2 answers
  • What were the main directions in which the Bantu-speaking peoples migrated?
    9·1 answer
  • Name and explain TWO factors that contribute to a detrimental<br>relationship<br>​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!