Answer:
the federal government
Explanation:
individuals dont build roads that often and private companies wouldn't have much reason to build roads either.
I want to say its C, but Im not sure
Many Anti-Federalists preferred a weak central government because they equated a strong government with British tyranny. Others wanted to encourage democracy and feared a strong government that would be dominated by the wealthy. They felt that the states were giving up too much power to the new federal government.
Tim Keller on Dr. King’s rejection of relativism:
When Martin Luther King Jr. confronted racism in the white church in the South, he did not call on Southern churches to become more secular. Read his sermons and “Letter from the Birmingham Jail” and see how he argued. He invoked God’s moral law and the Scripture. He called white Christians to be more true to their own beliefs and to realize what the Bible really teaches. He did not say, “Truth is relative and everyone is free to determine what is right or wrong for them.” If everything is relative, there would have been no incentive for white people in the south to give up their power. Rather, Dr. King invoked the prophet Amos, who said, “Let justice roll down like waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.” The greatest champion of justice in our era knew the antidote to racism was not less Christianity, but a deeper and truer Christianity.
(Reason for God, pp.64-65)
Answer:
A. Minorities and the poor
Explanation:
The domestic programs launches by president Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964-65 were called The Great Society. The term was coined by president during a speech at University of Michigan in 1964. The programs represented his domestic agenda and its goal was to completely eradicate <u>racial injustice and poverty.</u> New programs were designed to address <u>medical care, urban planners, transportation and rural poverty</u>. The programs were similar to the New Deal of Franklin D Roosevelt.
