1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nonamiya [84]
4 years ago
13

What are two important differences between the House of Representatives and the Senate

History
2 answers:
grandymaker [24]4 years ago
6 0

Congress is split into two chambers: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Congress writes national legislation by dividing work into separate committees which specialize in different areas. Some members of Congress are elected by their peers to be officers of these committees.

tankabanditka [31]4 years ago
6 0

Answer: House members must be twenty-five years of age and citizens for seven years. Senators are at least thirty years old and citizens for nine years. Another difference is who they represent. Senators represent their entire states, but members of the House represent individual districts.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Question 8 of 10
iogann1982 [59]

When the state often ignores the agreements laid by the central government this leads to the weakening of the central government as other countries doubted the integrity and strength of the central government.

The Articles of Confederation was a kind of agreement which was between 13 U.S. states and this agreement served as the first frame of the government in the United States of America. This agreement got its approval after a lot of debate that took place in congress. The articles which were proposed in the agreement created havoc as it weakened the central government and there was a strong confederation of the sovereign states. Due to this article, there became a need for a stronger Federal government. The articles failed due to many reasons. The primary one was that each state had only one vote in congress irrespective of its size.

Learn more about Articles of Confederation at:

brainly.com/question/7743965

#SPJ1

7 0
1 year ago
i was born in a city that is known as a center of trade which native American culture do I belong to?
Brums [2.3K]

Well, It could be the Ute's or Navajos

5 0
4 years ago
The _______ stated that if war should break out between Germany and the U.S, Mexico would be urged to side with Germany and to a
pentagon [3]
<span>B however, before it could come to fruition, british intelligence intercepted the telegram and decyphered it </span>
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
''The British Empire was a force for good in India.” How far do you agree with this statement?
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

uh, nowhere. They were HORRIBLE

Why not, you may ask?

- The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

- By 1890 about 6,000 British officials ruled 250 million Indians

- Racism was also reflected in the penal code. There had never been a taboo against homosexuality in Indian culture and practice until the British Victorians introduced one.

- Britain also helped solidify and perpetuate the iniquities of the caste system, which was a horrible division of people.

- Religion became a useful means of divide and rule, with the fostering of a two-nation theory that eventually divided the country and made partition inevitable; one million were killed and 17 million displaced.

- Winston Churchill, widely heralded as one of the greatest brits was viciously racist and perpetuated hardline racism in British colonies around the world, once saying: “I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion . . . Let the Viceroy sit on the back of a giant elephant and trample Gandhi into the dirt.”

- Up to 35 million died unnecessarily in famines; London ate India’s bread while India starved, and in 1943 nearly four million Bengalis died. It was their own fault, according to Churchill, for “breeding like rabbits”.

and that's barely skimming the surface. The sheer number of atrocities Britain has committed in India established its legacy as being one of genocide, tyranny, cultural theft and erasure. The few positive things its presence accomplished are far outweighed by the sick acts it carried out on the Indian people.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these was NOT a Spanish advantage over the Native Americans?
VARVARA [1.3K]
I'm pretty sure is muskets and cannons ... but not 100%
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which two of the following advances did Europeans borrow from China?
    6·2 answers
  • How long was the shortest bill introduced in the Missouri Senate?
    8·2 answers
  • The last office in the presidential line of succession is
    12·1 answer
  • One of the reasons the conduct of the 2000 election in Florida was questioned by observers was because that state’s election off
    11·1 answer
  • What is containment mean?? <br> US history
    15·2 answers
  • Under the United States Constitution, which of the following is every state guaranteed ?
    10·2 answers
  • The priests were corrupt and idolatry was widely practiced during the time of:
    9·1 answer
  • What was one notable invention during the Song Dynasty?
    5·2 answers
  • Check all that apply.
    10·1 answer
  • According to Madison in Federalist 10, what problem would the Constitution help to remedy? To what extent? Why are political fac
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!