1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
3 years ago
7

Before the Civil War, slavery expanded in the South rather than in the North because

History
1 answer:
miss Akunina [59]3 years ago
7 0
Thats where they was ported and the fields that noone really knew much about needed tended, so they put slaves out there do free work and huge profits and so on the North decided to hold its own and was more different way of survival did not have same climate conditions to afford protecting slaves from winter so expenses be diff from south
You might be interested in
Expansion, peak, recession, and trough are all periods of the _____________
Nookie1986 [14]
The Economic Cycle.
An economy when graphed will essentially look like a wave. It may not be perfect, as there will be different size expansions and contractions/recessions.
Expansions is when the market is doing well or correcting from a recession. The Peak is the highest point that specific economic period can achieve. From there, the market will enter a Recession or Contraction where it goes down. It’s Trough is the lowest point that the contraction will reach.
8 0
3 years ago
Does the government have the right or power to suppress dissent in wartime? why or why not. Do you think the U.S. would have ris
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Yes and No

Explanation:

The United States should have the right to suppress any dissent that puts US operations at risk. But shouldn't just suppress an opinion

7 0
3 years ago
PLZZZ HELP MEEE LOLOLOL
yawa3891 [41]

<span><span>IT IS an awful lot of rubbish. Since 1960 the amount of municipal waste being collected in America has nearly tripled, reaching 245m tonnes in 2005. According to European Union statistics, the amount of municipal waste produced in western Europe increased by 23% between 1995 and 2003, to reach 577kg per person. (So much for the plan to reduce waste per person to 300kg by 2000.) As the volume of waste has increased, so have recycling efforts. In 1980 America recycled only 9.6% of its municipal rubbish; today the rate stands at 32%. A similar trend can be seen in Europe, where some countries, such as Austria and the Netherlands, now recycle 60% or more of their municipal waste. Britain's recycling rate, at 27%, is low, but it is improving fast, having nearly doubled in the past three years.Even so, when a city introduces a kerbside recycling programme, the sight of all those recycling lorries trundling around can raise doubts about whether the collection and transportation of waste materials requires more energy than it saves. We are constantly being asked: Is recycling worth doing on environmental grounds? says Julian Parfitt, principal analyst at Waste & Resources Action Programme (WRAP), a non-profit British company that encourages recycling and develops markets for recycled materials.Studies that look at the entire life cycle of a particular material can shed light on this question in a particular case, but WRAP decided to take a broader look. It asked the Technical University of Denmark and the Danish Topic Centre on Waste to conduct a review of 55 life-cycle analyses, all of which were selected because of their rigorous methodology. The researchers then looked at more than 200 scenarios, comparing the impact of recycling with that of burying or burning particular types of waste material. They found that in 83% of all scenarios that included recycling, it was indeed better for the environment.Based on this study, WRAP calculated that Britain's recycling efforts reduce its carbon-dioxide emissions by 10m-15m tonnes per year. That is equivalent to a 10% reduction in Britain's annual carbon-dioxide emissions from transport, or roughly equivalent to taking 3.5m cars off the roads. Similarly, America's Environmental Protection Agency estimates that recycling reduced the country's carbon emissions by 49m tonnes in 2005.Recycling has many other benefits, too. It conserves natural resources. It also reduces the amount of waste that is buried or burnt, hardly ideal ways to get rid of the stuff. (Landfills take up valuable space and emit methane, a potent greenhouse gas; and although incinerators are not as polluting as they once were, they still produce noxious emissions, so people dislike having them around.) But perhaps the most valuable benefit of recycling is the saving in energy and the reduction in greenhouse gases and pollution that result when scrap materials are substituted for virgin feedstock. If you can use recycled materials, you don't have to mine ores, cut trees and drill for oil as much,says Jeffrey Morris of Sound Resource Management, a consulting firm based in Olympia, Washington.Extracting metals from ore, in particular, is extremely energy-intensive. Recycling aluminium, for example, can reduce energy consumption by as much as 95%. Savings for other materials are lower but still substantial: about 70% for plastics, 60% for steel, 40% for paper and 30% for glass. Recycling also reduces emissions of pollutants that can cause smog, acid rain and the contamination of waterways.</span></span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What statement best describes the role of working class children in the workforce during Great Britain industrial revolution
Radda [10]

Children performed all sorts of jobs including working on machines in factories, selling newspapers on street corners, breaking up coal at the coal mines, and as chimney sweeps. Sometimes children were preferred to adults because they were small and could easily fit between machines and into small spaces.

source: https://www.ducksters.com/history/us_1800s/child_labor_industrial_revolution.php

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the end of the war affect the U.S. economy?
AlladinOne [14]

Answer:

America's involvement in World War II had a significant impact on the economy and workforce of the United States. The United States was still recovering from the impact of the Great Depression and the unemployment rate was hovering around 25%. Our involvement in the war soon changed that rate. American factories were retooled to produce goods to support the war effort and almost overnight the unemployment rate dropped to around 10%. As more men were sent away to fight, women were hired to take over their positions on the assembly lines. Before World War II, women had generally been discouraged from working outside the home. Now, they were being encouraged to take over jobs that had been traditionally considered 'men's work.'

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the differences between jefferson and hamilton's attitudes toward popular participation in the decision-making process.
    12·1 answer
  • How was the missouri compromise a success?
    12·1 answer
  • In your own words, what did washington mean in his farewell address when he warned about the "threat of the spirit of party"?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements explains how Benjamin Franklin reacted to the Stamp Act when he learned the colonists were so
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the political views of the Democratic Party in America in 1845 and how they related to the American Party platform. 2 o
    12·1 answer
  • What document were the delegates at the Constitutional Convention attempting to revise
    8·1 answer
  • What are the "things" used in making goods and services?
    12·1 answer
  • What is a totalitarian state
    9·2 answers
  • Desert predators are most likely to be successful in finding their quarry _______. a. during the day b. at night c. before noon
    14·2 answers
  • How did the war of 1812 end
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!