Answer:
Initially, white colonists viewed Native Americans as helpful and friendly. ... The Native Americans resented and resisted the colonists' attempts to change them. Their refusal to conform to European culture angered the colonists and hostilities soon broke out between the two groups.May 14, 2004
This is not a school question, is it? You are trivializing genocide. The way to do what you are asking, though, is to become informed and do well enough in school so that you can become a political scientist of historian, so that you can have a real voice and be heard and influence people.
Start by googling the Armenian genocide. No, start by trying to answer why it's wrong to say what you just said. Look the word up.
Some might say FDR, some might say LBJ, others might say Nixon. The reality is that the power of the Legislative vis a vis the Executive is in constant flux.
In terms of sweeping policy initiatives FDR's administration might be the time when the Presidency took on many of its contemporary roles. The activism of the LBJ administration was a further expansion of the New Deal-era role of the FDR administration. LBJ also was arguably the first president to use the US armed forces in foreign engagements without Congress declaring war (Gulf of Tonkin resolution)--a precedent we have become all too familiar with. In terms of 'imperial pretensions' Nixon assumed all the New Deal, Great Society, civil rights activism, and the ability to intervene militarily of the preceding Presidencies and expanded them to include unfettered use of the CIA and FBI.
Answer: "Locke believed these rights aren't given to people—people are born with them."
Explanation: These rights, according to Locke, are not granted to humans; they are born with them. People learn and develop in different ways, according to him, since they are exposed to diverse things. The one thing that all humans have in common is that they are human and have a human essence that is universal.
