Answer:
dispositional attribution.
Explanation:
There are two distinct types of attribution in psychology including the situational or external and internal or dispositional attribution.
Dispositional attribution: In psychology, the term "dispositional attribution" is also denoted as "internal attribution" and is determined as a phenomenon an individual thinks or infers that the other person's behavior or an event is caused due to some personal factors, for example, feelings, traits, or abilities.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the dispositional attribution.
Nonconformity
The base word you can see is conform, meaning to subject or comply to
Non- = prefix meaning not doing something
Nonconformity would therefore mean that you don't subject or want to do something such as a law or rule
The answer would be : The power to Impeach
The power to impeach refer to the power of civilian to charge against the holder of public office for any type of misconduct such as fraud, corruption, etc.
Answer:
c. voluntary participation
Explanation:
In the context, Professor Smith conducts a research in the dating behaviors of her college students. She wishes to track the students dating behavior through their entire college careers. So on her first class she explains her research work to the students and does the survey during the class.
Thus in this case, the research has an effect on the voluntary participation of the college students as all the students present in her class was given the survey to complete and they were not asked for their voluntary participation in he survey.
Hence the correct option is (c).
The third statement is correct.
Nick, who was our dorm advisor, and Joe, Nick's roommate, raised their concerns to the school residence office. They wanted to know why Dennis didn't have to share a room.
In the first statement, there are two subjects- Nick and Joe. However, "his" is used in the predicate referring only to one of the two subjects. This made the sentence incorrect. The same with the second statement. It used not only "his" in the first sentence, but it also used "he" in the second sentence referring to only one of the two subjects mentioned, instead of "they".
