How did progressives think cities should be governed?

1 answer:

katrin2010 [14]3 years ago

6 0

Generally speaking, many progressives in western countries feel that cities should be governed "tightly" with a strong government presence on the streets that is intended to reduce crime rates.

You might be interested in

= D 764 Notes JPG | DocHub Clever Portal X Snowden 7th grade Social Studix earn.edgenuty.com/Player/ E Kendrick Miliam - in_ Vir

ruslelena [56]

Answer:

Explanation:

If transportation is important, maybe it is because of the accessibility of fish, or other foods.

4 0

3 years ago

What animal best represents John Locke, and explain why.

Soloha48 [4]

Answer:

Tiger grrrr lol jsp it would be a WOLF , John Locke would be represented as a lone wolf an animal that acts independently or generally lives or spends time alone instead of with a group not being led by one single leader (Monarch) and having a more complex governing of himself (Democracy).

Explanation:

Represnting Locke, all humans have pre-political rights that afford them protection against the aggression of others. But where does this leave animals? For Locke, animals do not have natural rights, and therefore human interactions with animals are property governed (Side By Side Comparison to The Governing of Rights with a single Monarch as a leader and then a Majority Ruled GOVT) . John would be an independent self governed animal such as a more complex democracy .

6 0

3 years ago

Was the Treaty of Versailles a just and fair peace treaty or an unjust and unfair one, and why?

nirvana33 [79]

The treaty of Versailles was an unfair treaty because they blamed everything on Germany and restricted its capabilities as a country and they had to pay for the war to the other states/counties

5 0

4 years ago

Who founded the women's social and political union in Great Britain

Stels [109]

I am pretty positive it was Emmeline Pankhurst

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

John Adams still believed that the term “massacre” was appropriate. Even though he was the defense attorney, what is his reason

Rus_ich [418]

Answer: He was honored to serve his country in the defense for the trial and completely agreed with the verdict. He was disappointed to have to defend the British soldiers and disagreed with the verdict.

4 0

3 years ago