You have been blessed with an ANSWER from <em>Zaxoosh</em> -
The Answer To Your Question Is:
They viewed it as an excessive use materials, a waste basically.
I hope this ANSWER helped you, If it did please consider RATING my answer and THANKING me for the answer + giving me BRAINIEST. And if your one of the best, you could FOLLOW my profile.
It was forbidden to marry a white person
They had to remove their hats when wearing it near a white person to show respect
They didn't have a right to hold public office
Holding riots was illegal and police could even arrest them for standing in groups
They couldnt have public education
Thye didnt have the right to serve in a jury
their curfew was 10 and they could be arrested if they were found outside later
Answer:
okk
Explanation:
mark me as brainliest and follow and like my answer
Based on historical evidence, it is true that the policy of investing in Latin America is based on trade and diplomacy so that the region would become a market and solid ally for the United States.
This is evident in the formation of the No Transfer Principle of 1811 and the Monroe Doctrine of 1823.
Also, the investment is concentrated on the following objectives:
- reduction of the European influence,
- U.S. territorial expansion,
- facilitating American commerce.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the policy of investing in Latin America is based on trade and diplomacy so that the region would become a market and solid ally for the United States.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/11650973
