Answer:
the answer is A
Explanation:
Contract 2 gives the quarterback the Highest value therefore he should accept contract 2
Answer:
(a) $1,760
(b) $1,100
Explanation:
Given that,
Skysong, Inc. made three purchases of merchandise:
(1) 320 units at $5
(2) 420 units at $7
(3) 520 units at $8
Units on hand at the end of the period = 220
(a) Under FIFO method,
cost of ending inventory:
= Units on hand at the end of the period × $8 (From the last purchase)
= 220 × $8
= $1,760
(b) Under LIFO method (Comprise units from the first purchase),
cost of ending inventory:
= Units on hand at the end of the period × $8 (From the first purchase)
= 220 × $5
= $1,100
If there was a 100 units decrease at every price level, the new equilibrium price would be<u> $2.00.</u>
<h3>Equilibrium Price </h3>
- Price where quantity demanded is equal to quantity supplied.
<h3>What is the New Equilibrium price?</h3>
Reducing by 100 units, all the quantity demanded units will lead to the following new units:
- $10 - 100
- $8 - 140
- $6 - 270
- $4 - 290
- $2 - 310
We can see that at $2, both the demand and supply are at 310 units which makes this the new equilibrium.
Find out more on the equilibrium price at brainly.com/question/14203212.
it's half a year out of 5, so 1/10 of the useful lifetime of the van
$61,000 - $4,900 is $56.1000
one tenth of that will be what we are looking for, so option b. should be just right to fit here
Answer:
enforceable even without Robin's signature because both parties are merchants.
Explanation:
Enforceable law defines when one person performs legally contract and that party enforce or impose to the other.
Therefore in the given situation, Robin sends the written confirmation of the sale, which was sufficient under the statute of frauds, Bellman signs and Robin fails to send the goods. So, this contract is enforceable because without Robin's signature because both parties are merchants.
